0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

coronavirus and annual leave

30 March 2020

Regulations have now been published allowing employees to carry forward 4 weeks of their statutory annual leave entitlement. The circumstances in which such leave can be carried forward are limited – it can only be carried forward where it is “not reasonably practicable” for the employee to take that leave as a result of the effects of coronavirus (including on the worker, the employer or the wider economy or society). Any carried forward leave must be used in the next two leave years. Payment in lieu cannot be made for this holiday, except where employment terminates.

An additional restriction has also been introduced on employers who wish to use their existing ability under the Working Time Regulations 1998 to “block” leave being taken at particular times (assuming there is no contrary “relevant agreement” in force). This can now only be exercised where the employer has “a good reason” for doing so. What will or will not amount to a good reason is unclear as the term is undefined. However, in circumstances where exercising this right would prevent an employee from taking their statutory leave in the relevant leave year, this “good reason” is likely to be examined more closely.

These limits are an attempt to balance the importance of employees being able to take regular leave, and the extraordinary circumstances we are now in which may require uninterrupted continuity for certain key industries such as healthcare and food. It is an acknowledgement that the employees involved in such efforts should not be penalised by losing a large part of their statutory holiday as a result. However, the wording wouldn’t cover employees who simply don’t wish to take leave now because they can’t travel to their holiday destination of choice or carry out the activities that they wish to – it would still be reasonably practicable for them to take this leave - and nor would it allow the carry forward of this statutory leave for reasons unrelated to the effects of coronavirus.

Coronavirus support

We are helping across business, health, education and government sectors:

related opinions

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

Furlough scheme extended to October

The Chancellor announced on Tuesday 12th May 2020 that the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) is to be extended to the end of October.

View blog

Furlough and insolvency – are employees protected?

As more retailers and restauranteurs fall victim to insolvency, the Court of Appeal has confirmed that the contracts of employment of employees furloughed before a company is placed into administration will be treated as having been adopted by its administrators, therefore entitling the employees to “super-priority” status over other creditors.

View blog

High Court extends employer’s duty of care to Dubai whistleblower

Employers with global networks which include a base in the UK should be aware that they can face expensive and damaging negligence claims from employees who are based overseas regardless of the whistleblowing regime.

View blog

Sarah Hooton

Sarah Hooton

Professional Development Lawyer

View profile

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up