Coronavirus and annual leave
Regulations have now been published allowing employees to carry forward 4 weeks of their statutory annual leave entitlement but the circumstances in which such leave can be carried forward are limited.
Regulations have now been published allowing employees to carry forward 4 weeks of their statutory annual leave entitlement. The circumstances in which such leave can be carried forward are limited – it can only be carried forward where it is “not reasonably practicable” for the employee to take that leave as a result of the effects of coronavirus (including on the worker, the employer or the wider economy or society). Any carried forward leave must be used in the next two leave years. Payment in lieu cannot be made for this holiday, except where employment terminates.
An additional restriction has also been introduced on employers who wish to use their existing ability under the Working Time Regulations 1998 to “block” leave being taken at particular times (assuming there is no contrary “relevant agreement” in force). This can now only be exercised where the employer has “a good reason” for doing so. What will or will not amount to a good reason is unclear as the term is undefined. However, in circumstances where exercising this right would prevent an employee from taking their statutory leave in the relevant leave year, this “good reason” is likely to be examined more closely.
These limits are an attempt to balance the importance of employees being able to take regular leave, and the extraordinary circumstances we are now in which may require uninterrupted continuity for certain key industries such as healthcare and food. It is an acknowledgement that the employees involved in such efforts should not be penalised by losing a large part of their statutory holiday as a result. However, the wording wouldn’t cover employees who simply don’t wish to take leave now because they can’t travel to their holiday destination of choice or carry out the activities that they wish to – it would still be reasonably practicable for them to take this leave - and nor would it allow the carry forward of this statutory leave for reasons unrelated to the effects of coronavirus.
Contact
Mark Hickson
Head of Business Development
onlineteaminbox@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)370 270 6000
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
In Person Event
Mock Employment Tribunal
Legal Update - Employment Rights Bill
The Employment Rights Bill: Is it here yet?
Opinion
Pride Month: A time to review DEI
Opinion
Employer redundancy guide: Sourcing alternative employment
Legal Update
DEI in school governance: Key themes and insights
Guide
Using AI for recruitment: The data issues
Guide
The socio-economic duty: Shifting mindsets for true social mobility
Legal Update
Trans matters in health for trusts and acute settings: The decision in For Women Scotland
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s School Leaders Survey illustrates concerns over financial resilience ahead of spending review
Press Release
Majority of UK organisations remain committed to sustainability and ESG, says new research
Opinion
Disciplinary procedures and mental health: Employer considerations
Opinion
Supreme Court gender ruling: Ensuring inclusion in the workplace
Legal Update
Celebrating diversity and inclusion in the NHS: Equality, Diversity, and Human Rights Week 2025
Legal Update
Supporting mental wellbeing in the workplace: Practical steps for businesses
Legal Update
A New chapter for families: Reflecting on the first month of the introduction of neonatal care leave
Legal Update
Trans matters in care: The decision in For Women Scotland
Legal Update
Trans matters in sport: The decision in For Women Scotland
Opinion
EHRC releases guidance for employers after Supreme Court ruling on definition of woman
Legal Update
2025/26 employment rates and limits: Are costs increases having a negative impact on the job market?
Legal Update
The concept of sex is binary: For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers Supreme Court case explained
Legal Update
Updated Modern Slavery Act Transparency Guidance: Key obligations and steps for businesses
Legal Update
Do whistleblowing protections extend to external job applicants?
Article - Employment Rights Bill
The Employment Rights Bill: What the new amendments mean for employers
On-Demand - Care Focus webinar series
Care Focus: Regulatory and employment
Legal Update
Fair conduct dismissal: Guidance from the Court of Appeal
Legal Update
Employment healthcare briefing: March 2025
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Obsequio Group on strategic expansion
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Mercia Ventures on £3.9m investment in highways drainage specialist Crown Plus
Legal Update
The ripple effect: How US DEI shifts are impacting UK and Ireland businesses
On-Demand
EdCon 2025: Top five takeaways
Opinion
That’s Asda price: Tribunal considers that retail roles are of equal value to distribution centre jobs
Legal Update
Transformative leadership: In conversation with Lauren Thorpe
Legal Update
Reflecting our communities: The push for diversity in school governance
Legal Update
Legal challenges in workplace inclusion: A Scottish tribunal's examination of transgender rights
Opinion
Making your organisation neuroinclusive
Legal Update
Browne Jacobson’s EdCon conference for school leaders returns for fifth year
Legal Update
Charities and freedom of expression
Legal Update
DEI in school governance: Interview with Chiltern Learning Trust leadership
Legal Update
Limitation in claims for Child Sexual abuse (CSA)
