Employment & Workforce Survey 2021: Vaccinations in the workplace
Covid vaccinations remain a particularly charged topic, with strong feelings held by both those pro- and anti-vaccination.
Covid vaccinations remain a particularly charged topic, with strong feelings held by both those pro- and anti-vaccination. With the Government largely advocating vaccination by encouragement rather than through mandates (although see below for the different approaches taken within health and social care in England), employers have grappled with whether a “no jab – no job” policy can be adopted. Others have considered whether to link returns to work premises with proof of vaccination – requiring those who are unvaccinated to continue working from home.
For those employer who wish to encourage vaccination, a link to the Government’s vaccination guide for employers can be found here. Acas guidance can also be found here.
Can employers insist on Covid vaccination?
No employer can lawfully force an employee to be vaccinated – the issue instead is whether the employer can refuse to employ someone who is unvaccinated, or can take disciplinary action and/or dismiss an existing employee if they refuse to comply with a policy of mandatory vaccination.
There are different risks of mandatory vaccination depending upon whether an employer is seeking to impose the requirement on its current workforce, or on new employees only. There are also different risks depending upon the nature of the employer and the work undertaken – and, in particular, whether they fall within the different provisions applicable to care homes or the new proposed wider health and social care provisions (see below).
Claims could include discrimination allegations from staff (or applicants) who have decided not to have the vaccination (for example on religious grounds, health grounds or because they are pregnant) and feel that their personal views and/or beliefs or health has not being considered. If existing staff refuse to be vaccinated and are dismissed as a result, this could lead to claims for unfair dismissal (if they have the required 2 years’ service).
In view of these risks (particularly combined with the approach taken more generally in the UK to keep vaccination as a matter of personal choice), it is unsurprising that many employers have not gone further than encouraging vaccine uptake. Our recent survey indicates that the vast majority of responders (over 80%) are not insisting on compulsory vaccinations for any reason.
Are you considering requiring evidence of vaccination status at all?
Those that were asking for evidence of vaccination status were from a range of sectors – including health, manufacturing and industrials and government. There were no clear links between whether or not evidence of vaccination status was requested and the availability of enhanced contractual sick pay.
Vaccinations, self-isolation and sick pay
Enhanced contractual sick pay was generally viewed by responders as of low importance to staff retention. Our question asked responders to rate the importance of enhanced sick pay to staff retention with 1 being the most important, 5 being the least important. Enhanced sick pay received the highest number of category 5 votes. It, together with “other benefits” made up the vast majority of combined category 4 and 5 votes (just shy of 80%).
However, issues have arisen following the changes to the self-isolation requirements for those who are vaccinated (introduced in August 2021). For example, the type and amount of pay for those who are required to self-isolate due to close contact (where the individual themselves is not ill) is a question that many employers are asking. Also, employers are asking if self-isolation periods should be treated as sickness absence for the purposes of absence management. (Just to be clear, self-isolation absences would still fall within the SSP regime as per the government’s guidance, assuming the other qualifying requirements are met.)
Whilst the majority of responders (58%) offer enhanced contractual sick pay to their employees, over 10% indicated that their enhanced sick pay offering had been, or was being, amended due to the changes to the self-isolation requirements. Again, responders falling within this category were from a range of sectors; however, half were either from education or local government sectors.
The self-isolation requirements changed in November 2021 – requiring all close contacts with the Omicron variant to self-isolate, regardless of vaccination status. However, with effect from 14 December 2021, the distinction between vaccinated and unvaccinated where there has been close contact with someone who has tested positive has been reinstated once again. Those who are vaccinated are not required to self-isolate due to close contact but instead must undertake daily testing for a period of 7 days. Those who are unvaccinated are required to self-isolate for 10 days. How such self-isolation absences should be treated is therefore likely to be a continuing issue for employers.
Health and social care - Care Homes
The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) (Coronavirus) Regulations 2021 were made on 22 July 2021 and came into force on 11 November 2021. It is now a legal requirement to restrict access to CQC-regulated care home premises in England to those who have not received a full dose of an authorised Covid-19 vaccination, unless one of the limited exemptions apply.
Exemptions apply to:
- Residents;
- Those who have medical exemptions;
- Friends and family of residents who are visiting;
- Those under 18;
- Those attending in the execution of their duties as a member of the emergency services;
- Those entering to assist in an emergency or to provide urgent maintenance work;
- Those who are visiting a service user who is dying; and
- Those who are visiting a service user to provide comfort or support in the event of a bereavement.
There are very few medical exemptions which will apply – examples include those who have had an allergic reaction to a previous dose of the vaccine, or any of the vaccine components. Time-limited exemptions may apply for those with short-term medical conditions or who are pregnant, should they wish to take it.
It is possible for individuals to self-certify that they meet the medical criteria for exemption. A specific self-certification form is available on the Government website. However, self-certification will only be possible for a limited period of time. Initially, this was to be available until 24 December 2021 but due to delays in the formal certification process, this has been extended to 31 March 2022. All those who self-certify before 24 December will have until 31 March to secure formal proof of their medical exemption status. The extension letter is clear that from 1 April 2022, proof of a formal medical exemption or full vaccination against COVID-19 will be required in order to comply with the Regulations and continue working in a CQC-regulated care home.
There is a specific process for seeking a NHS COVID Pass to formally prove medical exemption – including first requesting an application form by telephone only. Once the form has been completed and returned, guidance indicates that results will be posted 2 to 3 weeks after applying.
Pregnant women can instead rely on their MAT B1 certificate; the exemption will, however, expire 16 weeks after childbirth.
Wider health and social care
The Government has also announced its decision to move ahead with compulsory COVID-19 vaccinations for certain health and social care staff working in England. Steps are proposed to be introduced with effect from 1 April 2022, following concerns that a more immediate push for compulsory vaccinations might place too much pressure on health and social care provision and a potential staff exodus during the always challenging winter months.
The Government’s proposed approach to put the requirements on a statutory footing is through an amendment to the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. Providers of CQC regulated activities will only be allowed to deploy individuals who have been fully vaccinated against COVID-19 (or who are exempt) to roles where they interact with patients or service users. This is wider than “frontline” staff as it will include other non-clinical workers who have face to face contact with patients – such as receptionists, ward clerks, porters and cleaners.
The proposed Regulations will apply in health and social care settings including hospitals, GP practices and where care is delivered in a person’s home. They will apply to CQC-regulated activities whether they are publicly or privately funded. They will also apply where the regulated activity is delivered through agency staff, volunteers or trainees, or contracted to another provider.
This is a different approach to that taken in respect of care homes where, as set out above, the obligation relates to those entering the premises of CQC regulated care homes and is not simply limited to those persons undertaking direct treatment or personal care as part of the carrying on of a CQC regulated activity.
Guidance from NHS England and NHS Improvement published on 6 December 2021 to assist healthcare employers to prepare can be found here.
If you would like discuss the impact of any of the issues raised above on your organisation, please feel free to contact Emma Hughes.
Contact

Emma Hughes
Head of HR Services
emma.hughes@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 2338
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Employment claims: the new rates and limits from 6 April 2023
Opinion
Plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce approved by government
Opinion
Increase to 20 hour limit on supplementary employment for Health and Care Worker visa holders
Article
New report highlights risk of sidelining ED&I in school trusts
Opinion
Mopping up after a leak – how businesses can take steps to protect their confidential information
Online Event
Wellbeing and financial considerations – practical solutions for challenging times
Press Release
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
Legal Update
Teacher strikes – lessons learnt so far
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
On-Demand
Employment update webinar
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Opinion
Fire and re-hire – draft statutory code
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
Opinion
Consultation on holiday entitlement – part-year and irregular workers
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Opinion
Twitter facing employment claims following mass redundancies
News that Twitter is being threatened with multiple claims by UK employees following mass redundancies provides a reminder of the risks that comes with an employer implementing large scale redundancy exercises.Legal Update
Industrial Action and Minimum Service Levels
Legal Update
Discrimination comes of age
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Opinion
Rising Employment Tribunal backlog
Legal Update
Official statistics demonstrate a new wave of age discrimination claims
Opinion
Menopause and the NHS workforce addressing the female brain drain…
Opinion
4-day working week a success?
The Covid-19 pandemic drastically changed the world’s way of working, with increased flexibility being greatly desired by employees. Earlier on in the year, a number of organisations trialled the concept of a 4-day working week – which has clearly been a success for many.Legal Update
Coming of age
Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021.
Published Article
Starling Bank employment tribunal
The outcome of the Employment Tribunal claim brought by Gulnaz Raja against Starling Bank Limited (1) (Starling), and Matthew Newman (2) was reported last month.
Published Article
EU banks show slow progress on gender diversity
Opinion
Rising wages ahead
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Opinion
World Cup 2022 – how employers can avoid scoring an own goal!
The World Cup kicks off in Qatar on Sunday 20 November 2022, with the final taking place on Sunday 18 December 2022. Undoubtedly, this is a huge sporting event, and many employees will be keen to show their support for their favourite teams. However, due to the time difference, start times for the matches are between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. UK time, which could have an impact on employers if employees who wish to watch the matches are scheduled to work.
Legal Update
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations?
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
Legal Update
The Starling Bank disability discrimination decision
Opinion
The vanishing dismissal
Where an employee appeals against their dismissal under a contractual appeal procedure and their appeal is successful, reinstatement to their previous role is automatic and does not require approval or agreement from the employee.
Opinion
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations post Bathgate?
Settlement agreements in an employment context are ordinarily used to provide both parties with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship – but what happens when there is alleged discrimination after entering into a settlement agreement?
Legal Update
IR35 rules here to stay after government U-turn
A few weeks ago we brought you news that following the Government’s mini-budget it was confirmed that the off-payroll working rules (known as “IR35”) put in place for public and private sector businesses from 2017 and 2021 would be scrapped from April 2023.
Legal Update
Redundancy consultation and selection concerning expiry of a fixed term contract – EAT put the spotlight onto a ‘selection pool of one’
In Mogane v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether it was fair to dismiss a nurse as redundant on the basis that that her fixed-term contract was due to expire before that of her colleague.
Opinion
Lying on your CV – what can possibly go wrong?
The majority of people do not feel the need to embellish their CV to get that coveted position and move on up the career ladder. Their worthiness and benefit to the hiring organisation are easily demonstrated through the recruitment process – application, psychometric testing, selection day or interview.