The consultation has been prompted by the specific issue of ‘debt for yield’ to ensure that the PWLB can continue to support local authority investment.
This article is taken from July's public matters newsletter. Click here to view more articles from this issue.
The Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) is one of the main lenders to local government and accounts for around two thirds of local authority debt. The government has issued a consultation on its future lending terms.
According to the consultation, the government has been prompted to consult on limited interventions to address the specific issue of ‘debt for yield’ so that the PWLB can continue to support local authority investment in service delivery, regeneration and housing without restricting local authority's powers and freedoms to deliver local services.
A report by the National Audit Office (NAO) highlighted that a minority of local authorities have started using low-cost loans from the PWLB, which lends to local authority for capital projects to buy investment property primarily for rental income. Whilst this type of borrowing can be compelling for individual local authorities, the government view ‘debt for yield’ as an activity that introduces risks locally and nationally.
According to the government, at local level, this exposes ratepayers to the risk that if income does not materialise, it leaves the local authority with the inflexible commitment to keep up with repayments on their loans. Whereas within the wider public sector, the government views this activity as diverting money from core services such as schools, hospitals and roads. Further, access to cheaper finance by local authorities the government argues can make it harder for business to compete and in the wider economy, it may crowd out public investment and risk distorting the property market.
The NAO estimates that local authorities bought £6.6 billion of commercial property between 2016 – 17 and 2018 – 19. With the fall in the price of PWLB loans this made it valuable for local authorities to use these loans to cover their interest costs plus an average annual profit of around 1%-2% if the assets performed as expected. For a three-year period, net lending by the PWLB increased by £12.7 billion.
The government’s concerns are that where public money is diverted into assets that serve no direct public policy purpose, the value for money of the system is undermined as follows:
Nevertheless, the consultation document recognises that local authorities have owned assets that could serve a commercial purpose and use commercial structures to advance their core role in service delivery, housing and regeneration. Whilst the government’s position is that it is committed to supporting this valuable investment, it considers that action has become necessary to address the increase in commercial activity that is motivated primarily for yield rather than for direct pursuit of policy objectives.
The proposals put forward include:
Local authorities wishing to buy investment assets primarily for yield could continue to do so but not via new loans from the PWLB in the year in which they have bought the asset. Loans taken out under the old system would not be affected. The changes would only apply to larger authorities in England, Scotland and Wales with no changes intended to the PWLB lending arrangements for smaller local authorities (meaning parishes, town and community councils and drainage boards) as the issue of debt for yield seems to be limited to larger authorities.
The consultation has a series of questions focusing on the proposed changes including the processes that would be introduced, the plans that a local authority would need to submit as part of an application and the making of certain declarations, as well as defining and categorising activities for which borrowing is sought.
As the PWLB is an important lender for local government and these changes are likely to impact on future projects, engaging with the consultation is an important opportunity for local authorities to influence these changes. Due to Covid-19, the deadline for responding has been extended to 31 July 2020. Full details on the consultation can be found here.
Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Announced in September but scrapped on 17 November the investment zone proposals were very short lived. The proposal has now morphed into the proposal for a smaller number of clustered zones earmarked for investment.
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
In ‘failure to remove’ claims, the claimant alleges abuse in the family home and asserts that the local authority should have known about the abuse and/or that they should have removed the claimant from the family home and into care earlier.
Across the UK, homelessness is an urgent crisis, and one that is set to grow amid the rising cost of living. Local authorities are at the forefront of responding to this crisis, but with a lack of properties that are suitable for social housing across the UK, vulnerable individuals and families are often housed in temporary accommodation.
Updates include UK Shared Prosperity Fund, contracts, Subsidy Control Bill, data controller liability, Government Covid-19 procurement and Highway Code revisions.
The complex and rather nebulous transitional subsidy control regime set out in the UK-EU Trade and Co-operation Agreement and the UK’s wider international commitments has made it difficult for public authorities and those working with them to proceed with certainty where subsidies are involved.
Investment zones have been introduced by the Conservative party to get the United Kingdom (UK) ‘working, building and growing’. They are to be designated sites which provide time-limited tax incentives, streamlined planning rules and wider support for local growth to encourage investment and accelerate the development of housing and infrastructure that the UK needs to drive economic growth. Processes and requirements that slow down development will be stripped back with the intention of attracting new investment.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
It is clear that the digital landscape, often termed cyberspace, is a man-made environment, in which human behaviour dominates and where technology both influences and aids our role in it — through the internet, telecoms and networked computer systems, which are often interdependent. The extent to which any organisation is potentially vulnerable to cyber-attack depends on how well these elements are aligned.
Three months on from the commencement of the new statutory Integrated Care Systems (ICS) Anja Beriro and Gerrard Hanratty reflect on the main themes and issues that have come from the new relationship between local government and health.
The Procurement Bill (the Bill) has now been with us for about four months, during which time there have been a huge number of amendments proposed in the House of Lords (circa 320). Lately, there has been less mention of it — unsurprising, really, given everything else going on in politics recently — but here’s a summary of some of the key issues and themes so far.
Browne Jacobson has been named as a supplier on Crown Commercial Service’s (CCS) Public Sector Legal Services Framework on Lot 1a – full-service provision (England and Wales) and Lot 2a – general service provision (England and Wales).
Browne Jacobson has been ranked as a Top Tier law firm in 25 key practice areas in Legal 500 UK 2023, the independent directory of comparative law firm performance. The firm also continues to underpin its status as one of the leading law firms in the East Midlands region with 16 Tier 1 rankings.
