Devolution is the transfer of powers in areas like transport, housing and skills in England and since the Cities and Local Government Devolution Act 2016 has been a much-discussed topic.
Devolution is the transfer of powers in areas like transport, housing and skills in England and since the Cities and Local Government Devolution Act 2016 has been a much-discussed topic.
It has been one of the main focuses of the Levelling Up White Paper and even more so now the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill 2022 (“the Bill”) is going through the parliamentary process to give additional devolution powers. The Bill has been introduced to materialise the common rationale that ‘local services should be taken closer to the people they affect’. There is clear and significant evidence that when councils have the freedom and funding to make local decisions, outcomes improve and the country gets better value for money. The question is to what extent are these devolution powers effective in achieving better outcomes for local communities? And do these future devolution powers empower local leaders and communities to enter into devolved arrangements and succumb to the government’s ambitious plans to offer every part of England a devolution deal by 2030?
The main points of the Bill are that it:
The Bill, for the purpose of devolution, has the primary objective to make the process of carrying out public matter related decisions simpler, easier and quicker and which is a huge benefit for local authorities. The . As the Bill works to streamline the process, this will encourage more local authorities to enter into Combined County Authority (CCA) arrangements as the current cost and administrative effort required to establish a CCA and enter into devolution deals is a disincentive for many local authorities. In effect, the Bill is likely to make it quicker for a local authority to change their governance model where legislative powers are decentralised.
As a result of the Bill, devolved powers and the establishment of CCAs will extend to those local authorities outside of urban areas. For those within urban areas, it will open up the opportunity to benefit from devolved powers. This is a significant change in levelling up the country to meet public local needs. Generally, local authorities in rural areas have an increasingly greater pressure to serve geographically dispersed populations. Devolution of additional powers may make it easier for those local authorities to service the specific needs of dispersed rural populations.
The new Infrastructure Levy is likely to be a very small proportion as a share of overall council budgets and some have expressed that it falls far short of the government’s ambition in the Levelling Up White Paper to simplify local government funding. As it stands, local government must bid for project funding across a series of competitively allocated pots; an approach which uses up time and resources and which stymies long-term strategic thinking. Further simplification of funding streams, by moving away from a reliance on these competitive pots, will be an important part of making new devolution arrangements work and should be a priority for the government.
Having an elected mayor is a key part of entering into a significant devolution deal. It is possible to enter into devolution deals without a mayor, but if a mayor is elected then the local authority attains more powers. Local authorities and CCAs have the opportunity to opt into having a directly elected mayor and reaping the benefits of additional powers, so there is a strong incentive and potential benefit for a local authority or CCA to enter into a devolved agreement subject to a mayoral constitution. However, where does this leave the smaller regional local authorities or those local authorities that have held referendums on having an elected mayor where that proposal has been rejected? For them, it may be that there is a city-type programme or non-mayoral deal that could be offered in the future which some say is only slightly better than nothing.
Local authorities are very much on the front line in providing responses to the health and social care crisis following COVID-19. The desperate need to improve social care across the board means that any improvements through devolved powers and funding for health and social care activities must be a key part of an Integrated Care Strategy (ICS). Bringing together the NHS, local government and other partners to help meet health and social care needs is an approach that is generally looked at optimistically. The government has said that ‘ICS must put a single person in charge of health and social care in each of their constituent ‘places’ by April next year and let them manage a ‘significant’ chunk of the budget.’ This questions the level of accountability that such a person may be subject to which could then undermine the ability to deliver an ICS. On the other hand, it allows the budget for health and social care to be controlled on a local level, confined to persons best placed to distribute funds where it is needed most. It is hoped that devolved powers will enhance the ability to deliver integrated health and social care at local levels to address public concerns such as staffing issues and patient waiting times and better all-round treatment for patients living and working in their local authority areas. To what extent devolved powers will have an impact on these issues is yet to be determined.
For some, devolution in England is the answer to allow local authorities to bring about the greater destiny of their locality. For others, it is simply a mirage. One roundtable participant from a private roundtable held in November 2021 warned of “chaos” if the government just “lets a thousand flowers bloom”. As the chase continues to meet the government’s 2030 objective, the potential challenges and practicalities of devolution in England may become more apparent.
Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Announced in September but scrapped on 17 November the investment zone proposals were very short lived. The proposal has now morphed into the proposal for a smaller number of clustered zones earmarked for investment.
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
In ‘failure to remove’ claims, the claimant alleges abuse in the family home and asserts that the local authority should have known about the abuse and/or that they should have removed the claimant from the family home and into care earlier.
Across the UK, homelessness is an urgent crisis, and one that is set to grow amid the rising cost of living. Local authorities are at the forefront of responding to this crisis, but with a lack of properties that are suitable for social housing across the UK, vulnerable individuals and families are often housed in temporary accommodation.
Updates include UK Shared Prosperity Fund, contracts, Subsidy Control Bill, data controller liability, Government Covid-19 procurement and Highway Code revisions.
The complex and rather nebulous transitional subsidy control regime set out in the UK-EU Trade and Co-operation Agreement and the UK’s wider international commitments has made it difficult for public authorities and those working with them to proceed with certainty where subsidies are involved.
Investment zones have been introduced by the Conservative party to get the United Kingdom (UK) ‘working, building and growing’. They are to be designated sites which provide time-limited tax incentives, streamlined planning rules and wider support for local growth to encourage investment and accelerate the development of housing and infrastructure that the UK needs to drive economic growth. Processes and requirements that slow down development will be stripped back with the intention of attracting new investment.
