Until a formal subsidy regime is put in place funding bodies must grapple with the complex and challenging exercise of legal obligations from the UK-EU TCA and numerous trade agreements to grant funding.
This article is taken from January's public matters newsletter. Click here to view more articles from this issue.
On 24th December the UK and EU reached an agreement in principle with the ‘UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement’ (UK-EU TCA).
The UK government ratified it and enacted the European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020. The EU gave its provisional approval with formal ratification to follow. At the same time, the UK government enacted secondary legislation (The State Aid (Revocations and Amendments) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020), which revoke EU State aid rules in the UK including all relevant regulations, safe gateways to grant aid and all applicable guidance with effect from 31st December 2020 (subject to the provisions of the Northern Ireland Protocol – see below).
However, while the old EU State aid rules have gone (for the most part), the UK remains committed to applying the new subsidy control principles in the UK-EU TCA. Funding bodies must grapple with the UK’s legal obligations related to State aid/subsidy control emanating from the UK-EU TCA and from numerous trade agreements and apply them to potential subsidy measures to ensure that they are lawful and do not breach those obligations. Until a formal subsidy control regime is put in place in the UK, this could be a complex and challenging exercise.
The UK-EU TCA provides, amongst other things, certain principles that should underpin any new subsidy control regime which may replace the EU State Aid rules (with limited exceptions.) Those principles are likely to be the most relevant to funding bodies as they are now implemented into domestic legislation.
The UK, as a member of the World Trade Organisation, continues to be subject to commitments and agreements - the most relevant here being the World Trade Organisation Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (WTO ASCM) which makes provision in relation to subsidy control and for countries impacted by subsidies to seek redress. In addition, the UK has signed numerous Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with other countries which must be considered when granting subsidies, as they may include provisions on subsidies.
Further, the Northern Ireland Protocol (NIP) will need to be considered where a measure may affect trade between Northern Ireland and the EU. Through the NIP, EU State aid rules will apply in certain, limited circumstances which are relevant to trade between NI and EU. The Northern Ireland Protocol Command Paper published by UK Government provides that subsidies will be within scope of the State aid rules in the NIP where there is a ‘genuine and direct’ link to NI, and a ‘real foreseeable’ impact on trade between NI and the EU. However, the interpretation of the protocol itself is broadly reserved to the European Institutions and it is worth being aware that the concept of ‘affecting trade’ in EU law sets a very low bar for application of the rules. There are also limited other circumstances in which the EU State aid rules continue to be relevant, for example in respect of measures already entered into under the old rules.
On 31st December, the UK government published guidance to assist funding bodies in understanding what international subsidy control commitments and related obligations the UK has as of 1st January 2021. All funding bodies must comply with these obligations when awarding subsidies.
From 1st January, funding bodies must determine whether their proposed subsidy carries any ‘appreciable risk’ of triggering any dispute under the WTO ASCM rules or the UK’s FTAs, as well as the UK-EU TCA and the NIP. They must also assess whether the proposed subsidy falls within the scope of any national subsidy control system that is established through primary or secondary legislation (although this is not yet in place).
Funding bodies must undertake their own analysis on a case by case basis to determine whether their proposed measures breach any of the international obligations. The guidance provides useful information that will help funding bodies when undertaking a review of proposed measures. However, the guidance makes it clear that it is not providing a definitive method for determining whether international and domestic legal obligations apply to a proposed subsidy and that the individual instruments themselves should be considered. It is worth noting that we are already seeing funding bodies applying for central government funding for State aid schemes being asked to revisit their State aid compliance statements to deal with the new rules.
The guidance provides a five-step process for analysing the position:
The WTO ASCM sets out its definition of a subsidy at Article 1, which can be summarised as a financial contribution provided by a public authority (including any public body) which confers a benefit on the recipient. A financial contribution includes (but is not limited to) measures such as a direct transfer of funds, such as a loan, potential transfers of funds, for example a guarantee and foregone revenue (not collecting debts or taxes which would otherwise be due).
In order to be a subsidy, a measure must be specific, meaning that it is targeted at a particular enterprise or industry or group of enterprises or industries within the jurisdiction of the granting authority. However, it is worth being aware that the WTO ASCM applies to goods-based activity only, whereas other agreements (for example the UK-EU TCA) apply to goods and services.
Certain subsidies are prohibited or subject to further conditions set out in the UK-EU TCA, other FTAs and the WTO ASCM. These are flagged in the guidance but should be checked on a case by case basis as the detail of each prohibition is not included within the guidance.
The UK-EU TCA contains a number of principles which aim to ensure that subsidies are not granted where they have, or could have, a material effect on investment or trade. Many other FTAs contain similar principles, aimed at avoiding subsidies being granted which have anti-competitive effects on trade between the parties to the FTA. As set out above, the UK-EU TCA will be the most relevant to funding bodies as it is incorporated into domestic law and so imposes legal duties. Any principles contained within the UK-EU TCA and/or any FTA must be followed and applied on a case-by-case basis, subject to any exemptions which apply.
The principles set out within the UK-EU TCA:
These principles were already embedded into the previous State aid regime – particularly in the case of GBER. The UK-EU TCA also sets out guidance dealing with specified areas such as transport and R&D. Usefully, there is also an increased ‘de minimis’ limit of 325,000 Special Drawing Rights (just under £350,000).
For subsidies which are in scope of the UK-EU TCA, as a matter of best practice, funding bodies are advised to complete the template included in Annex 2 to the guidance, which records their compliance with the principles in designing the subsidy. This should be retained for record and may be requested by the EU or by an interested party. Public bodies should be aware that other subsidy control instruments may also contain provisions on transparency and consultation which should be considered when granting any subsidy.
The Guidance provides that funding bodies must assess any proposed subsidy against any UK FTAs (including the UK-EU TCA), and the WTO ASCM rules. Any subsidy may be subject to challenge through the relevant mechanisms if the other country evidences that the subsidy causes actual adverse effects on their interests.
However, the more likely risk would be a domestic challenge to the subsidy. Until a new regime is implemented this is most likely to take the form of a judicial review action and this is expressly anticipated in the guidance.
Unlike the EU State Aid rules currently there is no requirement under the UK-EU TCA to notify subsidies to a body for approval before awarding the subsidy. This may change once a national subsidy control system, including an independent body is created. Similarly, there is no prior approval mechanism under the WTO ASCM. However, funding bodies should be aware that if a measure is caught by the EU State aid rules as a result of the application of the Northern Ireland Protocol, the usual requirement to notify the Commission unless the measure is subject to an exemption will apply.
Funding bodies should consult relevant legislation and carry out a proportionate assessment in making the decision to award any subsidy and ensure this is recorded in accordance with the guidance and the terms of the relevant international instrument if applicable. Eventually this may be collected by BEIS as part of its planned transparency database.
Any subsidies which were lawfully entered into under the EU State aid rules prior to 1st January will be compliant and will not require any further review.
For projects where State aid advice was obtained before 1st January, but the aid has not yet been awarded, e.g. where a grant agreement has not been entered into, the funding body will need to consider whether the funding continues to be lawful under the new regime. There may also be projects where a funding body was awarded “upstream” funding (e.g. from central government) but where it has not yet awarded that funding “downstream” (e.g. to a different delivery body). In these circumstances, the funding body may need to consider both the old and the new rules in relation to the project in question.
Where a funding body has relied on an exemption in the past (e.g. under GBER), it is possible that this can be relied upon in applying the principles set out in the UK-EU TCA. However, this should be carefully cross checked to ensure compliance with the principles and also needs to be considered in the light of the WTO ASCM and the FTAs.
It is likely that the guidance on subsidy control will be updated to take account of new FTAs, as well as the launch and use of the database to record subsidies, the role and functions of the independent body which is responsible for any new subsidy control system and on the role of the courts in subsidy cases.
We can expect the UK government to begin a consultation shortly with proposals for a national subsidy control regime, which is not only important for compliance with international obligations but also to establish a national framework for all parties involved that is clear and workable.
If you have any questions on these latest developments, including the technical guidance, please do get in touch.
Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Announced in September but scrapped on 17 November the investment zone proposals were very short lived. The proposal has now morphed into the proposal for a smaller number of clustered zones earmarked for investment.
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority  UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
In ‘failure to remove’ claims, the claimant alleges abuse in the family home and asserts that the local authority should have known about the abuse and/or that they should have removed the claimant from the family home and into care earlier.
Across the UK, homelessness is an urgent crisis, and one that is set to grow amid the rising cost of living. Local authorities are at the forefront of responding to this crisis, but with a lack of properties that are suitable for social housing across the UK, vulnerable individuals and families are often housed in temporary accommodation.
Settlement agreements in an employment context are ordinarily used to provide both parties with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship – but what happens when there is alleged discrimination after entering into a settlement agreement?
Updates include UK Shared Prosperity Fund, contracts, Subsidy Control Bill, data controller liability, Government Covid-19 procurement and Highway Code revisions.
The complex and rather nebulous transitional subsidy control regime set out in the UK-EU Trade and Co-operation Agreement and the UK’s wider international commitments has made it difficult for public authorities and those working with them to proceed with certainty where subsidies are involved.
Investment zones have been introduced by the Conservative party to get the United Kingdom (UK) ‘working, building and growing’. They are to be designated sites which provide time-limited tax incentives, streamlined planning rules and wider support for local growth to encourage investment and accelerate the development of housing and infrastructure that the UK needs to drive economic growth. Processes and requirements that slow down development will be stripped back with the intention of attracting new investment.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
It is clear that the digital landscape, often termed cyberspace, is a man-made environment, in which human behaviour dominates and where technology both influences and aids our role in it — through the internet, telecoms and networked computer systems, which are often interdependent. The extent to which any organisation is potentially vulnerable to cyber-attack depends on how well these elements are aligned.
Three months on from the commencement of the new statutory Integrated Care Systems (ICS) Anja Beriro and Gerrard Hanratty reflect on the main themes and issues that have come from the new relationship between local government and health.
In July, the long-awaited statutory guidance on the Subsidy Control Act 2022 (Act) was published in draft form (Draft Guidance). A consultation on the draft guidance has recently ended and the results have not yet been published – it may therefore change before the final version is published.
The Procurement Bill (the Bill) has now been with us for about four months, during which time there have been a huge number of amendments proposed in the House of Lords (circa 320). Lately, there has been less mention of it — unsurprising, really, given everything else going on in politics recently — but here’s a summary of some of the key issues and themes so far.