Pay inequality
The High Pay Centre has issued its interim report based on the first pay ratios disclosed between 1 January 2020 and 31 April 2020.
The High Pay Centre has issued its interim report based on the first pay ratios disclosed between 1 January 2020 and 31 April 2020. Under The Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018, Quoted Companies (as defined in the Companies Act 2006) with an average of more than 250 UK employees are required to publish the ratio of their CEO’s remuneration to the median, 25th and 75th quartile pay remuneration of their UK employees (based on full time equivalent pay and benefits). There are specific requirements for how the pay ratios need to be compiled – further details of these requirements can be found here.
As these pay ratios are required for the pay awarded for financial years starting on 1 January 2019, the first of these ratios are starting to be published within annual reports. The High Pay Centre makes it clear that this interim report is based on only 107 pay reports from FTSE 350 companies – and that a further report will be prepared once more ratios have been published. Whilst the interim report highlights some trends, it does set out where this is based on limited data. For example, the healthcare industry is identified within the interim report as having the highest CEO to median ratio at 129:1; however, this is based on data disclosed by only four healthcare companies, three of which disclosed very high CEO pay (ranging from £7 million to over £14 million, compared to a FTSE 100 average of £3.6 million).
The interim report also flags the extent to which the pay ratios can be skewed by the particular employment model used – for example, whether a company employs a high number of lower paid employees directly, or uses a franchise model which excludes these equivalent individuals from the ratios.
Whilst it may therefore be difficult to run direct comparisons between organisations, publishing this data will still highlight the issue of pay inequality, particularly in the current environment where so many businesses will be looking at ways to operate in the most efficient ways possible. For some business, as already widely reported in the press, this has resulted in redundancies being considered; for others, pay freezes or cuts may be implemented. Transparency in respect of pay rates and ratios may well be used in this context – a fair redundancy process necessarily involves an employer considering alternatives to redundancies and addressing pay inequality between the various quartiles may well be seen as an alternative to redundancies, particularly where cost reduction is the aim.
The highest CEO to 25th quartile ratio identified in the interim report was the CEO earning 543 times that of the 25th quartile - and bear in mind that the very definition of this means that a quarter of the employees within the workplace earn less than the 25th quartile figure. The rest of the top 10 all had CEOs earning more than 200 times that of the 25th quartile. The report accepts that redistribution of CEO earnings across lower and middle earners would not make a huge per-employee difference. However, it does include statistics on the impact of pay redistribution across the upper and lower quartiles. Whilst the report is not necessarily arguing that such adjustments should be enacted, it is flagging the impact of such adjustments as a matter that businesses and stakeholders should at least consider.
And if employers are looking to cut employment costs going forward, it certainly seems likely that data from these pay ratios will be used, particularly in unionised environments, to highlight any disparate impact of proposals across different pay quartiles, or to suggest alternatives to or ways of mitigating against redundancies.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Employment claims: the new rates and limits from 6 April 2023
Opinion
Plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce approved by government
Opinion
Increase to 20 hour limit on supplementary employment for Health and Care Worker visa holders
Article
New report highlights risk of sidelining ED&I in school trusts
Opinion
Mopping up after a leak – how businesses can take steps to protect their confidential information
Online Event
Wellbeing and financial considerations – practical solutions for challenging times
Press Release
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
Legal Update
Teacher strikes – lessons learnt so far
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
On-Demand
Employment update webinar
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Opinion
Fire and re-hire – draft statutory code
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
Opinion
Consultation on holiday entitlement – part-year and irregular workers
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Opinion
Twitter facing employment claims following mass redundancies
News that Twitter is being threatened with multiple claims by UK employees following mass redundancies provides a reminder of the risks that comes with an employer implementing large scale redundancy exercises.
Legal Update
Industrial Action and Minimum Service Levels
Legal Update
Discrimination comes of age
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Opinion
Rising Employment Tribunal backlog
Legal Update
Official statistics demonstrate a new wave of age discrimination claims
Opinion
Menopause and the NHS workforce addressing the female brain drain…
Opinion
4-day working week a success?
The Covid-19 pandemic drastically changed the world’s way of working, with increased flexibility being greatly desired by employees. Earlier on in the year, a number of organisations trialled the concept of a 4-day working week – which has clearly been a success for many.Legal Update
Coming of age
Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021.
Published Article
Starling Bank employment tribunal
The outcome of the Employment Tribunal claim brought by Gulnaz Raja against Starling Bank Limited (1) (Starling), and Matthew Newman (2) was reported last month.
Published Article
EU banks show slow progress on gender diversity
Opinion
Rising wages ahead
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Opinion
World Cup 2022 – how employers can avoid scoring an own goal!
The World Cup kicks off in Qatar on Sunday 20 November 2022, with the final taking place on Sunday 18 December 2022. Undoubtedly, this is a huge sporting event, and many employees will be keen to show their support for their favourite teams. However, due to the time difference, start times for the matches are between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. UK time, which could have an impact on employers if employees who wish to watch the matches are scheduled to work.
Legal Update
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations?
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
Legal Update
The Starling Bank disability discrimination decision
Opinion
The vanishing dismissal
Where an employee appeals against their dismissal under a contractual appeal procedure and their appeal is successful, reinstatement to their previous role is automatic and does not require approval or agreement from the employee.
Opinion
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations post Bathgate?
Settlement agreements in an employment context are ordinarily used to provide both parties with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship – but what happens when there is alleged discrimination after entering into a settlement agreement?
Legal Update
IR35 rules here to stay after government U-turn
A few weeks ago we brought you news that following the Government’s mini-budget it was confirmed that the off-payroll working rules (known as “IR35”) put in place for public and private sector businesses from 2017 and 2021 would be scrapped from April 2023.
Legal Update
Redundancy consultation and selection concerning expiry of a fixed term contract – EAT put the spotlight onto a ‘selection pool of one’
In Mogane v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether it was fair to dismiss a nurse as redundant on the basis that that her fixed-term contract was due to expire before that of her colleague.
Opinion
Lying on your CV – what can possibly go wrong?
The majority of people do not feel the need to embellish their CV to get that coveted position and move on up the career ladder. Their worthiness and benefit to the hiring organisation are easily demonstrated through the recruitment process – application, psychometric testing, selection day or interview.