Managing parental complaints is one of the most time-consuming and emotionally draining parts of school leadership. Get it wrong and a straightforward grievance can spiral into formal proceedings, governor involvement, and months of unnecessary work.
Get it right (ideally at the earliest possible stage) and you can resolve most issues quickly, fairly, and with minimal disruption. That's the central message from our recent interview with Iain Grafton MBE, a school governance specialist whose career gives him a genuinely distinctive perspective on this challenge.
From detective to superintendent to school governance specialist, Iain's career trajectory is unusual, and it matters. With 30 years' service in the police and over 20 years' experience in school governorships, including in primary and secondary schools, he has spent decades working out why people complain, how they behave when they feel unheard, and what organisations can do to respond effectively.
A framework with its roots in serious research
The six-complainant framework Iain uses originates from academic work conducted by the University of Victoria in Australia. The research set out to understand why some people, starting as ordinary, reasonable individuals, reached a point where they felt the only way to be heard was to commit something atrocious.
That work was shared with law enforcement agencies around the world and arrived in the UK in the early 2000s, forming the basis for a nationwide rethink by police forces in England and Wales about how they handled and understood people who made complaints.
After his policing career, Iain recognised that the same understanding of how people complain could be transferred directly into the world of education. The result is a framework that school leaders can apply every time a parent or carer raises a concern.
Six types. Six responses. They don't mix.
The framework identifies six distinct complainant types, and for each type, there's a different approach to managing that person and their complaint. As Iain puts it, the six responses don't mix well with the six types.
The types explained
Type 1 are normal, reasonable, ordinary people - the vast majority. Type 2 are difficult or awkward. Type 3 are litigious or dishonest complainants. Type 4 are altruistic complainants - genuine people acting on behalf of others. Type 5 make complaints as a hobby. And Type 6 - the tiniest proportion but the biggest challenge - are the querulous, the vexatious, the unreasonably difficult, the rude, and the irrational.
Shifting types
One of the most striking insights in the interview concerns how complainant types can shift. The principal reason people transform from one type to another is the way they are treated by the organisation they are complaining about. Our response to their complaint has a significant impact on the way in which they will behave towards us.
This has direct practical consequences for school leadership. The longer a school waits to deal with a complaint from an ordinary, reasonable person in Type 1, the less the chance of a successful resolution - because delay is already moving them towards Type 2. The outcome they originally wanted, which might have been nothing more than an apology, becomes something more formal. Work is created that needn't have been, simply because the complaint wasn't dealt with expeditiously when the person was in a Type 1 state.
What this means in practice
For school leaders managing difficult parents, the practical value of this framework is significant. Understanding complainant types helps you to set yourself up to have the most probable chance of reaching a speedy resolution with the minimum amount of management time invested in order to get an effective outcome.
Iain's three top recommendations for schools
- Dealing with that complaint your priority on the day it arrives: The speed of response, and the authenticity of that speed of response, is the greatest chance you have of resolving it.
- If you need to resort to your complaints policy, follow it: As it will be tested if the parent is not content with the outcome.
- Keep a written record of everything you do: This is so you can demonstrate your response if the matter is later scrutinised. And for those rare, genuinely challenging Type 6 situations? The strategy is to be really clear and really firm. Schools are not expected to require governors or head teachers to engage with intemperate, rude, or threatening correspondence. It's not what they're there to do.
Key takeaway
Iain's final recommendation is straightforward: most of the people who make a complaint will be normal, ordinary, reasonable people. Deal with them as quickly as you can and respond with a view to resolving it. Around 95% of complainants will be ordinary, reasonable people - but you need to deal with them quickly to have the best chance of an outcome.
The full interview with Iain Grafton MBE covers all six complainant types in depth, including how to identify each one, the triggers that cause people to shift between types, and the specific response strategies that work for each. If you're a head teacher, governor, or trustee looking to improve how your school handles parental complaints, it's well worth your time.
Contact
Victoria Hatton
Partner
victoria.hatton@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 2808
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Managing parental complaints in schools: Insights from a former detective
EdCon2026: Managing school complaints and data requests in the AI era
Schools white paper: Welcome steps forward, but will warm words be enough to tackle parental complaints?
The schools white paper is out – how #EdCon2026 will help you
SEND reforms consultation: Comment from education lawyer
Schools white paper: Reaction from education lawyers
Data (Use and Access) Act 2025: Key changes now in force
Parental complaints guidance for schools: Legal comment
Ofsted confirms changes to inspection framework
Schools White Paper: SEND reform, behaviour changes and other expectations
Be prepared for the 2025-26 school year
Updates to academy trust governance: A missed opportunity?
As FOS frustration grows, a judicial review offers hope
Data (Use and Access) Act 2025: What schools and trusts need to know
Top tips for schools handling AI generated complaints
Navigating SARs in schools
Education predictions: What does 2025 have in store for schools, trusts and universities?
An interview with HSBC’s ex-commercial manager
School complaints: handling problem parent behaviour
Browne Jacobson’s school leaders survey illustrates rising volume of parental complaints and impact on teachers
OFS Consultation on freedom of speech guidance
New case on the reasonable adjustment duty for pupils in schools
Proactive handling of vexatious complaints and abuse of staff in schools
Navigating parental complaints in turbulent times
Parental complaints surge: how can schools stay afloat?
Are parental complaints to schools undermining staff retention?
Lessons learnt: Handling a vexatious complaint - case study
The role of Ofsted in school complaints
Back to school – prepare to make light work of managing complaints
Best practice complaints management for schools and academy trusts
The Academies regulatory review and school complaints
New support launched to manage school complaints
Complaints management in schools - exploring a new way forward
School complaints culture and staff support
In this article we set out some of the support that's available to schools in a bid to reduce the overhead that complaints management generates.
Parental complaints that involve mental health issues
Given the symptoms of mental health problems it is not surprising that they can sometimes seem to evidence themselves in the complaints process. Does this change your approach and how do you deal with parents who appear to exhibit signs of poor Mental Health?
Is your school complaints process fit for purpose?
As part of the advisory service we offer schools, recent enquiries have arisen from academies being contacted by the Department for Education (DfE) about their complaints policies.