Skip to main content
Share via Share via Share via Copy link

Managing parental complaints in schools: Insights from a former detective

19 March 2026
Victoria Hatton

Managing parental complaints is one of the most time-consuming and emotionally draining parts of school leadership. Get it wrong and a straightforward grievance can spiral into formal proceedings, governor involvement, and months of unnecessary work.

Get it right (ideally at the earliest possible stage) and you can resolve most issues quickly, fairly, and with minimal disruption. That's the central message from our recent interview with Iain Grafton MBE, a school governance specialist whose career gives him a genuinely distinctive perspective on this challenge.

From detective to superintendent to school governance specialist, Iain's career trajectory is unusual, and it matters. With 30 years' service in the police and over 20 years' experience in school governorships, including in primary and secondary schools, he has spent decades working out why people complain, how they behave when they feel unheard, and what organisations can do to respond effectively.

A framework with its roots in serious research

The six-complainant framework Iain uses originates from academic work conducted by the University of Victoria in Australia. The research set out to understand why some people, starting as ordinary, reasonable individuals, reached a point where they felt the only way to be heard was to commit something atrocious. 

That work was shared with law enforcement agencies around the world and arrived in the UK in the early 2000s, forming the basis for a nationwide rethink by police forces in England and Wales about how they handled and understood people who made complaints.

After his policing career, Iain recognised that the same understanding of how people complain could be transferred directly into the world of education. The result is a framework that school leaders can apply every time a parent or carer raises a concern.

Six types. Six responses. They don't mix.

The framework identifies six distinct complainant types, and for each type, there's a different approach to managing that person and their complaint. As Iain puts it, the six responses don't mix well with the six types.

The types explained

Type 1 are normal, reasonable, ordinary people - the vast majority. Type 2 are difficult or awkward. Type 3 are litigious or dishonest complainants. Type 4 are altruistic complainants - genuine people acting on behalf of others. Type 5 make complaints as a hobby. And Type 6 - the tiniest proportion but the biggest challenge - are the querulous, the vexatious, the unreasonably difficult, the rude, and the irrational.

Shifting types

One of the most striking insights in the interview concerns how complainant types can shift. The principal reason people transform from one type to another is the way they are treated by the organisation they are complaining about. Our response to their complaint has a significant impact on the way in which they will behave towards us.

This has direct practical consequences for school leadership. The longer a school waits to deal with a complaint from an ordinary, reasonable person in Type 1, the less the chance of a successful resolution - because delay is already moving them towards Type 2. The outcome they originally wanted, which might have been nothing more than an apology, becomes something more formal. Work is created that needn't have been, simply because the complaint wasn't dealt with expeditiously when the person was in a Type 1 state.

What this means in practice

For school leaders managing difficult parents, the practical value of this framework is significant. Understanding complainant types helps you to set yourself up to have the most probable chance of reaching a speedy resolution with the minimum amount of management time invested in order to get an effective outcome.

Iain's three top recommendations for schools

  1. Dealing with that complaint your priority on the day it arrives: The speed of response, and the authenticity of that speed of response, is the greatest chance you have of resolving it. 
  2. If you need to resort to your complaints policy, follow it: As it will be tested if the parent is not content with the outcome.
  3. Keep a written record of everything you do: This is so you can demonstrate your response if the matter is later scrutinised. And for those rare, genuinely challenging Type 6 situations? The strategy is to be really clear and really firm. Schools are not expected to require governors or head teachers to engage with intemperate, rude, or threatening correspondence. It's not what they're there to do.

Key takeaway

Iain's final recommendation is straightforward: most of the people who make a complaint will be normal, ordinary, reasonable people. Deal with them as quickly as you can and respond with a view to resolving it. Around 95% of complainants will be ordinary, reasonable people - but you need to deal with them quickly to have the best chance of an outcome.

The full interview with Iain Grafton MBE covers all six complainant types in depth, including how to identify each one, the triggers that cause people to shift between types, and the specific response strategies that work for each. If you're a head teacher, governor, or trustee looking to improve how your school handles parental complaints, it's well worth your time.

Contact

Contact

Victoria Hatton

Partner

victoria.hatton@brownejacobson.com

+44 (0)330 045 2808

View profile Connect on LinkedIn
Can we help you? Contact Victoria

Related expertise

You may be interested in...