Why academy trusts must seriously consider how the new Model Articles may impact their operations.
For the first time in five years, on 30 June 2021 the Department for Education (DfE) updated the Model Articles for mainstream academies, special academies, 16 to 19 academies, alternative provision academies, free schools and studio schools (known as the Model Articles).
Whilst you may not be planning on changing your Articles, we recommend that you go beyond the headline technical changes and reflect on what is driving the changes and how the underlying issues and direction of travel may impact on how your trust operates in practice. It is also likely that the DfE will use trust expansions to help drive the adoption of the latest model so, if you are planning on growing over the next year, it would be sensible to know in advance what has changed. It is likely that those trusts on older Articles than the 2016 model are likely to be under a greater expectation to update their Articles.
The latest Model Articles helpfully include a summary at the beginning of the main changes. This briefing therefore seeks to help you draw out the key things you should take away.
What you will notice, when reading the changes, is that many of the themes have been trailed in previous editions of the Academies Financial Handbook and, perhaps unsurprisingly, complement developments in this year’s handbook, which has been renamed the ‘Academy Trust Handbook’ (Handbook), which will be effective from 1 September 2021 (you can find our separate briefing on the new handbook here).
The changes can be grouped together into three overarching themes:
To promote greater independence within the governance layers of trusts, the new Model Articles now require:
There is also a growing focus on the suitability of Members and Trustees. The list of Member disqualifications has been significantly expanded. The Trustee disqualification provisions have also been expanded. You should ensure that you are familiar with the full list, but importantly for both Members and Trustees, they can be disqualified where they are found to be unsuitable by the Secretary of State. These new provisions clearly supplement the provision of the Funding Agreements in this respect but mark, perhaps, half a ‘step back’ to when the Secretary of State could make appointments to the Membership and Board in early versions of the Model Articles.
The technical changes to disqualifications are important and you will want to digest them. More broadly, you may want to reflect on the practices and procedures you have in place for identifying and bringing on new Members and Trustees, inducting them, and what you provide in terms of ongoing support and development to ensure that you are satisfied that they are not only eligible, but also possess the competence, commitment and character to effectively serve on your Membership or Board.
It is also worth noting that the new Model Articles includes a footnote that, amongst other things, explains that Members should carefully consider the benefits and risks of appointing the CEO as a Trustee, seeking evidence to support their decisions. It is therefore very possible that your trust may be asked by the DfE, in the future, to provide a rationale and explanation of the evidence used. This is something that would be particularly relevant to consider when appointing a new CEO. We are able to provide guidance on the various benefits and risks of appointing the CEO as a Trustee if you wish.
The DfE’s focus on the role of Members continues. There are three areas where the DfE is looking to ensure effective engagement with Members.
Firstly, in this update, the requirement for the trust to hold an AGM (Annual General Meeting) is hardwired into the Articles and mandatory (until now this was always an option for the trust).
Secondly, the quorum for general meetings has been increased to a majority of Members (if you adopt the DfE’s preference of five members, this raises quorum requirement from two to three).
Thirdly, the DfE has sought to provide clarity as to the duties of Members. Last year the Supreme Court gave a landmark judgment confirming that members of charities are fiduciaries (someone who owes a single-minded duty of loyalty to their beneficiary). You can access our briefing from the time here. In the latest model the DfE has extended Article 16A, which required Members not to take steps that cause the trust to breach its charitable objects, and extended it to place a duty on Members to “act in a way which they decide, in good faith, will be most likely to further the purposes” of the trust. This wording is taken from the model constitution for Charitable Incorporated Organisations (a relatively new form of charity), and embeds in the Articles the nature of the fiduciary relationship for the first time.
Beyond these headlines, we recommend that trusts take the opportunity to:
It is worth noting that the new Model Articles include provisions for virtual Members’ meetings too. Whilst there is a clear need for virtual Board meetings, the ‘governance world’ is far more divided on whether virtual Members’ meetings are a good thing, having regard to the role of Members and the nature of Members’ meetings but the options is there if you wish to adopt it in future.
Increasingly, we were being asked by clients, when updating their Articles, to make them gender neutral. The DfE has taken the opportunity in this update to make the model gender neutral.
With the pandemic leading to the move to online Board and committee meetings, the DfE has incorporated improvements to the rules on virtual meetings. The old Model Articles wording (at Article 126) was written when different technology was available, and is drafted on the basis of Trustees electing to join by virtual means by giving notice in advance. The new Model now includes clearer rules that work with the growth of video call platforms.
Other changes include:
Please do get in touch if you want to discuss any of the issues above, or are interested in discussing the ways we can support the Board and executive leaders with their strategic functions.
Partner
nick.mackenzie@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)121 237 4564
Regardless of the outcome of ballots on industrial action, unless there is drastic change to funding for schools in relation to pay increases, it will be unusual to find any organisational budget that is not impacted by the current economic situation.
There’s been little evidence of interventions or financial management reviews this year and it appears the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) has re-focussed on financial delivery. It’s also telling that there were no discernible changes to the reporting of financial irregularities in the Academies Trust Handbook 2022.
The Children’s Commissioner, Rachel De Souza, has recently published a report “Beyond the labels: a SEND system which works for every child, every time”, which she intends to sit alongside the DfE’s SEND Review (2019) and SEND Green Paper (2022) and which she hopes will put children’s voices at the heart of the government’s review of SEND system.
As well as providing day-to-day support to help you focus on managing your settings, we also provide training and professional development on a range of topics to keep you and your staff up-to-date.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHCR) recently issued new, non-statutory guidance regarding the wearing of natural or protective hairstyles, specifically in reference to their representation in uniform, behaviour or standalone appearance policies.
Emma Hughes, head of HR services at Browne Jacobson, explains how CST’s updated executive pay report and the linked benchmarking service from XpertHR can help trust boards make robust decisions on pay.
There’s greater opportunity than ever for parents, carers and guardians to voice any concerns they have relating to their child’s education and for their concerns to be heard and to be taken seriously. While most staff in schools and academies are conscious of their legal duties relating to complaints management, many are struggling to cope with such a significant increase in the volume of complaints they must manage.
This guidance has been prepared to support academy trusts (Trusts) who want to hold a fully virtual Annual General Meeting (AGM) or a hybrid AGM, as we know that Trusts may want to be prepared for future disruption as well as having a general interest in holding more meetings virtually. The guidance also applies to other meetings of the Members (known as General Meetings).
We’re pleased to collaborate with Lloyds Bank, who recently asked us and audit and risk specialists Crowe UK to offer guidance that academy trusts would find helpful when considering setting up a trading subsidiary.
The DfE has published new guidance and opened the application process for window two of the Trust Capacity Fund (TCaF) for 2022/2023, with a fund of £86m in trust capacity funding focused particularly on education investment areas.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse was established in March 2015. We now have its report. As you would expect with such a broad scope, the report is long and makes a number of far-reaching recommendations. In this article, Dai Durbridge highlights seven of the 20 recommendations, sets out how they could impact on schools and suggests what steps to take now.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has been named as winner of the ‘Legal Advisors to Education Institutions’ category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.
Since the new Suspensions and Exclusions Statutory Guidance was published, we have received a lot of questions about the use of managed moves. For the first time, the Statutory Guidance does explain what a managed move is, but in relatively broad terms and does not cover the mechanics of how a managed move should operate.
Over 3000 young people from across the UK and Ireland took part in a virtual legal careers insight event, aimed at making the legal profession more diverse.
Holly Quirk, an associate barrister in Browne Jacobson’s Manchester office, was awarded the Legal Professional of the Year Award at this year’s Manchester Young Talent Awards.
The risk of assault against staff is, sadly, something that all schools need to consider carefully. Here one legal expert explains what they can do to protect staff and ensure they fulfil their duty of care.
An engineering company in Tyne and Wear was fined £20,000 after a worker fractured his pelvis and suffered internal injuries after falling through a petrol station forecourt canopy, whilst he was replacing the guttering.