When the Government’s lockdown suddenly fell upon us, we all scrambled to find new ways of working. One of our HR consultant tells us his experience of holding virtual meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic and how to get the best out of them.
Paul Miner, a consultant in Browne Jacobson’s in-house HR Services team, reflects on his experience of holding virtual meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic and how to get the best out of them.
When the Government’s lockdown suddenly fell upon us towards the end of March 2020, we all scrambled to find new ways of working. For us in Browne Jacobson’s HR consultancy team, one of the key challenges was how we could continue with those essential employment meetings that managers need to have with their staff from time to time, such as disciplinary and grievance hearings, performance management and capability discussions etc., without physically being able to engage with each other in an office or meeting room. We met with some resistance initially, but postponing hearings until normal working life could be resumed was unlikely to be a realistic or workable solution, even if social distancing restrictions were only to last three weeks. As it happens, we are now a further six-months-and-counting down the road, and social distancing still dictates that physical meetings should be avoided if possible and certainly minimised. The solution was, and remains, conducting such meetings by video call. To be fair, most people have now accepted this and initial opposition to attending virtual meetings has melted away – although even in the early days of the lockdown, if you held your ground and showed firm intent to hold such a meeting (with or without union attendance), I found employees would invariably back down and agree to attend.
I must confess, I had never heard of Zoom or Microsoft Teams (and all the other variations of the same thing) until March 2020, but they are now a normal feature of HR working life, none more so than as a means of conducting those employment meetings we had always previously assumed had to take place in person. The transition from the physical to the virtual disciplinary, grievance, capability etc. meeting/hearing has been bumpy at times and below I share my experiences and tips about how both the practical and human ‘bumps in the road’ have been flattened.
As I had never used Zoom or Microsoft Teams before the lockdown, it was important to remember that the employee we were meeting with probably hadn’t either. Even in the education sector, there are many employees who don’t use IT much (if at all) in their job. The subject matter of the meeting would already be stressful for the individual, so undertaking the meeting virtually added another layer of stress and it was important to minimise this as much as possible. With a physical meeting, other than the stress of the subject matter, all the employee needs to know is where and when the meeting is taking place and then turn up on time, usually with their trade union representative for company – what can go wrong with that? With a virtual meeting there is a lot more to it and more that can go wrong in joining the meeting, e.g. reliability of Wi-Fi at home, reliability and suitability of the device they will be using, finding a quiet room free from disturbance etc. – and having to do it all in isolation without their accompanying representative sitting alongside.
It seems obvious, but we reasoned that sending the employee a simple and clearly written guide on what to expect in a virtual meeting - how to join it, how to prepare for it, how to conduct themselves at it, how they could take adjournments to consult with their representative etc. – would reduce anxiety. We prepared this comprehensive guide and gave it to our clients so they could enclose it with the meeting invitation letter as a matter of routine. In particular, I found employees appreciated the opportunity to join a practice meeting a day or two before the actual meeting so they could familiarise themselves with the set-up and features of Zoom or Microsoft Teams.
In the early days of the lockdown, employees may have been juggling working from home with home schooling and looking after children. Inevitably, the thought of closeting themselves away at home (if they had the space to be able to) without disturbance from their children (and dogs and cats!) could be a challenge. As mentioned above, employees were also concerned about the unreliability of their domestic Wi-Fi and generally whether they would be able to complete a meeting that may take one or two hours or more. We were able to mitigate these problems by getting the employer to consider making a Covid-secure room available on-site for the employee’s use, with a reliable Wi-Fi connection and laptop. Even better, to offer a room sufficiently large enough for the employee and their representative to share in a socially distanced way, thus avoiding the isolation of a meeting at home, disturbances from other household members, and the fear of technical issues.
My experience has been that virtual meetings are far more intense than physical meetings and require a much greater degree of concentration. It is important that this is recognised, and I would recommend that breaks are programmed into the meetings, say every 45 minutes, to allow participants a regular five- or 10-minutes’ downtime. Because of the inherent ‘sociability’ of a physical meeting involving a group of people, there was always scope to find ‘space’ at appropriate times during the meeting to defuse the inevitable tension, maybe with a friendly or good-humoured comment about something unconnected to the subject matter of the meeting. Such comments can be made much more easily in a physical meeting, but I would recommend that, wherever possible, you also try to do this in a virtual meeting in order to dial down the intensity. HR professionals are usually naturally sociable people and can make their contribution here. A good personal example of this is where I’d had something of an intemperate battle with a trade union representative to get a disciplinary hearing off the ground and when we actually commenced the meeting I noticed on the wall behind him a framed album cover of David Bowie’s ‘The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars’ – one of my all-time favourite records. I took the opportunity to mention this in the introductions and it sparked a mutual appreciation that, although we may have professional disagreements, we also shared a connection. I am convinced the meeting went better than it may have done otherwise. Received wisdom is that in a virtual meeting you should consider ‘blurring’ your background and this may be the appropriate thing to do, but it can have its disadvantages!
It will be interesting to see when we eventually get past the pandemic whether physical meetings will come surging back. I am sure they will to an extent, but there is no doubt in my mind that properly prepared and conducted virtual meetings are here to stay, so we had better get used to them!
There’s been little evidence of interventions or financial management reviews this year and it appears the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) has re-focussed on financial delivery. It’s also telling that there were no discernible changes to the reporting of financial irregularities in the Academies Trust Handbook 2022.
The Children’s Commissioner, Rachel De Souza, has recently published a report “Beyond the labels: a SEND system which works for every child, every time”, which she intends to sit alongside the DfE’s SEND Review (2019) and SEND Green Paper (2022) and which she hopes will put children’s voices at the heart of the government’s review of SEND system.
There’s greater opportunity than ever for parents, carers and guardians to voice any concerns they have relating to their child’s education and for their concerns to be heard and to be taken seriously. While most staff in schools and academies are conscious of their legal duties relating to complaints management, many are struggling to cope with such a significant increase in the volume of complaints they must manage.
We’re pleased to collaborate with Lloyds Bank, who recently asked us and audit and risk specialists Crowe UK to offer guidance that academy trusts would find helpful when considering setting up a trading subsidiary.
The DfE has published new guidance and opened the application process for window two of the Trust Capacity Fund (TCaF) for 2022/2023, with a fund of £86m in trust capacity funding focused particularly on education investment areas.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse was established in March 2015. We now have its report. As you would expect with such a broad scope, the report is long and makes a number of far-reaching recommendations. In this article, Dai Durbridge highlights seven of the 20 recommendations, sets out how they could impact on schools and suggests what steps to take now.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has been named as winner of the ‘Legal Advisors to Education Institutions’ category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.
Since the new Suspensions and Exclusions Statutory Guidance was published, we have received a lot of questions about the use of managed moves. For the first time, the Statutory Guidance does explain what a managed move is, but in relatively broad terms and does not cover the mechanics of how a managed move should operate.
Over 3000 young people from across the UK and Ireland took part in a virtual legal careers insight event, aimed at making the legal profession more diverse.
Holly Quirk, an associate barrister in Browne Jacobson’s Manchester office, was awarded the Legal Professional of the Year Award at this year’s Manchester Young Talent Awards.
The risk of assault against staff is, sadly, something that all schools need to consider carefully. Here one legal expert explains what they can do to protect staff and ensure they fulfil their duty of care.
Browne Jacobson’s education team has again been confirmed as a national powerhouse after securing five Tier 1 rankings relating to Education in the latest edition of Legal 500 and maintaining a Band 1 UK-wide ranking for Education in Chambers & Partners UK 2023.
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
In this article we set out the criteria, expectations and support schools should consider if notified they fall within this new category.
The words “Grammar schools” are once again being whispered in government and the question of whether the creation of new grammar schools will finally be implemented as a central focus to DFE policy has re-surfaced.
As a result of a recent Charity Commission legal action, the former trustee of a Welsh charity was ordered to pay over £117,000 to Wrexham charities which support cancer patients.