Employment tribunals – changes ahead?
In September 2018, a consultation was launched regarding potential reform within the Employment Tribunal (“Tribunal”) system. 18 months later, the Law Commission has now published its 212 page report on Employment Law Hearing Structures.
Back in September 2018, a consultation was launched regarding potential reform within the Employment Tribunal (“Tribunal”) system. Fast forward more than 18 months later, the Law Commission has now published its 212 page report on Employment Law Hearing Structures. The report by itself does not make any changes to the Tribunal system but rather sets out the Law Commission’s recommendations (all 23 of them) for consideration by the Government.
Some of the more wide-reaching potential reforms that are discussed within the report – such as giving Tribunals the jurisdiction to consider allegations of discrimination outside the employment sphere (through the creation of a single Employment and Equalities Tribunal), providing for “concurrent jurisdiction” with the civil courts (i.e. allowing a claimant to “forum shop” by choosing whether to bring non-employment-related discrimination claims in the Tribunal or civil courts), or allowing Tribunals to issue injunctions – do not make it into the Law Commission’s recommendations. Nevertheless, the recommendations that have been made are significant and, if implemented, are likely to increase the number of claims within an already resource-stretched Tribunal system.
The key recommendations include:
- Standardising the time-limit by which claims need to be presented in the Tribunal to six months. This is currently the time limit for equal pay claims but would see a substantial extension for other types of claims such as unfair dismissal and discrimination claims. The Law Commission did not reach a conclusion as to whether this 6 month limit would be inclusive or exclusive of any ACAS conciliation period – an inclusive period would give the benefits of certainty and much-simplified time limit provisions but could put claimants under pressure to choose between conciliation and filing a claim.
- For those claims which currently allow for extensions to the primary limitation period only where it “was not reasonably practicable” for the claim to be filed in time (such as unlawful deductions from wages or unfair dismissal claims), giving Tribunals the discretion to extend time where it is “just and equitable to do so”. This wider discretion already applies in discrimination claims and was felt by the Law Commission to be a more suitable test which would facilitate more “just and fair” outcomes. However, if implemented, it remains to be seen how many out of time decisions would still be dealt with as preliminary matters, and how many would be deferred to the substantive hearing, with Tribunals preferring to hear all matters before determining whether time limits should be extended. In addition to this change, the Law Commission recommended introducing a power to extend time where it is just and equitable to do so in equal pay claims.
- Extending the jurisdiction of the Tribunal in respect of breach of contract claims. At the moment, the Tribunal can only hear breach of contract claims where employment has terminated and where the claim arises or is outstanding on termination. The Law Commission has recommended extending jurisdiction to cover breach of contract claims (and employers’ counter-claims) where employment is continuing, and where the claim arises after termination. Although unlawful deductions from wages claims can already be brought during employment, there is a two-year limit which applies in cases where there is a series of deductions; this two-year limit would not apply in breach of contract claims. The Law Commission recommended raising the breach of contract compensation cap from £25,000 to £100,000 (and thereafter maintaining parity with the limit on financial claims in the county court) – this would be particularly relevant where higher-paid employees (or those with longer notice periods) choose to bring both unfair and wrongful dismissal claims in the Tribunal as it would allow more significant notice pay amounts to be claimed separately outside of the unfair dismissal compensation cap. The Law Commission has also recommended extending the Tribunal’s jurisdiction to hear breach of contract claims brought by workers (but not the genuinely self-employed).
- Allowing respondents in discrimination claims to claim a contribution from others who are jointly and severally liable (regardless of whether or not that person is a party to the original claim). In discrimination claims, Tribunals are not able to apportion compensation where two (or more) individuals are responsible for the same act of discrimination. The compensation awarded is joint and several and the claimant is free to pursue whichever respondent they wish for the full sum (usually the one with the deepest pockets). The Law Commission considered whether, instead, compensation should be apportioned such that the claimant has to pursue each respondent for their share. However, instead, it recommended that the paying respondent should be able to claim a contribution from the others responsible (whether they had been named as a respondent or not).
It remains to be seen which of the recommendations will be taken forward by the Government but the Law Commission’s comments on the current Tribunal time limits (referred to as being “undesirably short”) will no doubt be welcomed by those groups who are currently seeking temporary time-limit extensions for harassment and discrimination claims from the Lord Chancellor due to the impact of the coronavirus.
+44 (0)115 976 6033
You may be interested in...
Employment claims: the new rates and limits from 6 April 2023
Plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce approved by government
Increase to 20 hour limit on supplementary employment for Health and Care Worker visa holders
New report highlights risk of sidelining ED&I in school trusts
Mopping up after a leak – how businesses can take steps to protect their confidential information
Wellbeing and financial considerations – practical solutions for challenging times
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
Teacher strikes – lessons learnt so far
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
Employment update webinar
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Fire and re-hire – draft statutory code
Menopause and the workplace
Consultation on holiday entitlement – part-year and irregular workers
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Twitter facing employment claims following mass redundanciesNews that Twitter is being threatened with multiple claims by UK employees following mass redundancies provides a reminder of the risks that comes with an employer implementing large scale redundancy exercises.
Industrial Action and Minimum Service Levels
Discrimination comes of age
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Rising Employment Tribunal backlog
Official statistics demonstrate a new wave of age discrimination claims
Menopause and the NHS workforce addressing the female brain drain…
4-day working week a success?The Covid-19 pandemic drastically changed the world’s way of working, with increased flexibility being greatly desired by employees. Earlier on in the year, a number of organisations trialled the concept of a 4-day working week – which has clearly been a success for many.
Coming of age
Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021.
Starling Bank employment tribunal
The outcome of the Employment Tribunal claim brought by Gulnaz Raja against Starling Bank Limited (1) (Starling), and Matthew Newman (2) was reported last month.
EU banks show slow progress on gender diversity
Rising wages ahead
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
World Cup 2022 – how employers can avoid scoring an own goal!
The World Cup kicks off in Qatar on Sunday 20 November 2022, with the final taking place on Sunday 18 December 2022. Undoubtedly, this is a huge sporting event, and many employees will be keen to show their support for their favourite teams. However, due to the time difference, start times for the matches are between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. UK time, which could have an impact on employers if employees who wish to watch the matches are scheduled to work.
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations?
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
The Starling Bank disability discrimination decision
The vanishing dismissal
Where an employee appeals against their dismissal under a contractual appeal procedure and their appeal is successful, reinstatement to their previous role is automatic and does not require approval or agreement from the employee.
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations post Bathgate?
Settlement agreements in an employment context are ordinarily used to provide both parties with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship – but what happens when there is alleged discrimination after entering into a settlement agreement?
IR35 rules here to stay after government U-turn
A few weeks ago we brought you news that following the Government’s mini-budget it was confirmed that the off-payroll working rules (known as “IR35”) put in place for public and private sector businesses from 2017 and 2021 would be scrapped from April 2023.
Redundancy consultation and selection concerning expiry of a fixed term contract – EAT put the spotlight onto a ‘selection pool of one’
In Mogane v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether it was fair to dismiss a nurse as redundant on the basis that that her fixed-term contract was due to expire before that of her colleague.
Lying on your CV – what can possibly go wrong?
The majority of people do not feel the need to embellish their CV to get that coveted position and move on up the career ladder. Their worthiness and benefit to the hiring organisation are easily demonstrated through the recruitment process – application, psychometric testing, selection day or interview.