Coronavirus and annual leave
Regulations have now been published allowing employees to carry forward 4 weeks of their statutory annual leave entitlement but the circumstances in which such leave can be carried forward are limited.
Regulations have now been published allowing employees to carry forward 4 weeks of their statutory annual leave entitlement. The circumstances in which such leave can be carried forward are limited – it can only be carried forward where it is “not reasonably practicable” for the employee to take that leave as a result of the effects of coronavirus (including on the worker, the employer or the wider economy or society). Any carried forward leave must be used in the next two leave years. Payment in lieu cannot be made for this holiday, except where employment terminates.
An additional restriction has also been introduced on employers who wish to use their existing ability under the Working Time Regulations 1998 to “block” leave being taken at particular times (assuming there is no contrary “relevant agreement” in force). This can now only be exercised where the employer has “a good reason” for doing so. What will or will not amount to a good reason is unclear as the term is undefined. However, in circumstances where exercising this right would prevent an employee from taking their statutory leave in the relevant leave year, this “good reason” is likely to be examined more closely.
These limits are an attempt to balance the importance of employees being able to take regular leave, and the extraordinary circumstances we are now in which may require uninterrupted continuity for certain key industries such as healthcare and food. It is an acknowledgement that the employees involved in such efforts should not be penalised by losing a large part of their statutory holiday as a result. However, the wording wouldn’t cover employees who simply don’t wish to take leave now because they can’t travel to their holiday destination of choice or carry out the activities that they wish to – it would still be reasonably practicable for them to take this leave - and nor would it allow the carry forward of this statutory leave for reasons unrelated to the effects of coronavirus.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
The NHS pay deal – are all Agenda for Change staff eligible?
Opinion
Further three-day junior doctors strike announced for June
Opinion
Non-compete clauses - proposed changes to employment contracts
Press Release
Browne Jacobson welcomes new Manchester employment partner Lee Ashwood
Legal Update
The Retained EU Law Bill – sunsetting the sunset
Legal Update
“Smarter Regulation” – proposed employment changes ahead
Opinion
New bill reaches tipping point: bill on allocation of tips at final stages
Opinion
Pay deal reached for Agenda for Change employees
Published Article
Third Party Harassment – haven’t we been here before?
Opinion
Injunction means nurses’ strike will be cut short
Opinion
New Acas guidance on mental health reasonable adjustments
Legal Update
Industrial action update: school strikes
Opinion
Further industrial action announced as RCN reject pay deal
Opinion
Confirmation of ACAS early conciliation in the context of multiple claim forms
Published Article
Managing flexible working requests – how to stay on the right side of the law
Legal Update
A pandemic legacy: flexibility
Opinion
Gender pay gap reporting – what are my obligations?
Opinion
Employment claims: the new rates and limits from 6 April 2023
Opinion
Plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce approved by government
Opinion
Increase to 20 hour limit on supplementary employment for Health and Care Worker visa holders
Article
New report highlights risk of sidelining ED&I in school trusts
Opinion
Mopping up after a leak – how businesses can take steps to protect their confidential information
Press Release
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
Legal Update
Teacher strikes – lessons learnt so far
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
On-Demand
Employment update webinar
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Opinion
Fire and re-hire – draft statutory code
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
Opinion
Consultation on holiday entitlement – part-year and irregular workers
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Opinion
Twitter facing employment claims following mass redundancies
News that Twitter is being threatened with multiple claims by UK employees following mass redundancies provides a reminder of the risks that comes with an employer implementing large scale redundancy exercises.
Legal Update
Industrial Action and Minimum Service Levels
