0370 270 6000

Maternity pay v Shared parental leave pay – discrimination?

29 October 2019

The introduction of shared parental leave (SPL) was intended to allow both parents of a child to take time out to care for that child during their early life. As with any new legislation, it has brought about uncertainty for employers regarding their obligations in relation to pay for SPL.

Within the legislation there is only a right to receive statutory payment for SPL and no reference to enhanced payment being made.

Statutory pay for SPL is currently paid at the same as Statutory Maternity Pay (SMP) except that during the first six weeks SMP is paid at 90% of whatever the employee earns (with no maximum).

Maternity legislation only provides the right to receive statutory pay, but as maternity leave has existed for a long period of time, many organisations have created policies which make enhancements to the statutory pay rate. When it comes to SPL, such organisations have not necessarily matched the enhanced rates of pay to SPL, even when it exists for those on maternity within the same organisation.

Two recent Court of Appeal cases considered whether it is discriminatory on the grounds of sex for employers to make enhanced payments to women during maternity leave but only pay the statutory rate to both men and women on SPL.

When originally heard at tribunal both cases (Ali v Capita Customer Management & Hextall v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police) were successful in proving discrimination. The former case was, however, overturned on appeal.

These cases led to much uncertainty and ambiguity for employers and the implications of these claims being upheld would have been far reaching in terms of cost and potential liability.

In May 2019 the Court of Appeal found there was no direct discrimination in these cases as a man on SPL is not in comparable circumstances to a birth mother on maternity leave. They concluded it was not indirect discrimination to have a policy of paying statutory pay to men on SPL because men and women in the comparison pool were not placed at any particular disadvantage by such a policy or practice.

This finding means employers now have clarification on this matter and can ensure their policies are fit for purpose taking the findings into account.

This article was originally published by Western Morning News and Business Live on 1 August 2019.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Coming of Age

Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021. The figure is more than double the number of disability discrimination claims (the next highest discrimination claim) and is a remarkable six-fold increase on the number of age discrimination claims presented the previous year.

View

Published articles

Starling Bank employment tribunal

The outcome of the Employment Tribunal claim brought by Gulnaz Raja against Starling Bank Limited and Matthew Newman was reported last month. The Judgment which is available online should be of significant interest to employers, including regulated organisations, in relation to Covid and medical conditions in general.

View

Published articles

EU banks show slow progress on gender diversity

Recent research by DBRS Morningstar has shown that, on average in 2021, using a sample of 43 European banks, gender diversity at board level was found to be gradually improving but is inconsistent across different countries.

View

Press releases

Browne Jacobson helps launch new innovative council company network with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School

Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.

View