Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked in World Trademark Review 2024
Intellectual property (IP) lawyers at Browne Jacobson have once again been included in the World Trademark Review (WTR) 1000 – an independent global ranking of the best trademark experts.
The UK and Ireland firm’s IP practice maintained its silver ranking in the enforcement and litigation category of the 2024 listing, a definitive resource for those seeking stellar trademark expertise and partners worldwide.
It also received a bronze award for prosecution and strategy, and was recommended for its transactional work, after the team was praised for its “ability to deliver advice in a way that is non-technical and shows a clear understanding of wider commercial goals”.
Alongside the firm accolade, six of Browne Jacobson’s specialist IP lawyers and litigators were named as recommended individual practitioners.
They included Declan Cushley, partner and head of the firm’s commercial and IP practice, who was recognised for “a sharp strategic mind who thinks long term”. Clients said he “dispenses spot-on advice to the likes of Iconic London on its growing trademark portfolio and commercialisation opportunities”.
IP partner Giles Parsons and trademark litigator Bonita Trimmer received recognition for their work in acting for the Match group in a high-profile trademark infringement against Muzmatch Limited at the IPEC and Court of Appeal. They were praised by clients for their “impressive knowledge of trademark law and ability to conduct litigation with intelligence, strategic thinking and teamwork”.
Mark Daniels “brings expert knowledge” to the high-tech patent litigation practice he heads up as partner, the report stated, while comments stated that IP partner Nick Smee’s “technical knowledge helps him to guide clientele through tricky situations”.
Senior associate IP lawyer Faye McConnell also received high praise for her “ability to translate technical legal information into relevant business information”.
Commenting on the team’s ranking, Declan said: “It’s fantastic to see the high-calibre work of our specialist IP practice has once again been met with such esteemed recognition across our various specialist areas.
“A 10th consecutive listing in the WTR 1000 reflects the capabilities of our full advisory team and the strength in our ability to build longstanding relationships with our broad client portfolio.
“We are proud to receive recommendations for six members of our team and it’s particularly pleasing to read so many comments from our clients praising those individuals not only for their comprehensive knowledge of trademark law, but their ability to tailor advice that is digestible and relevant to businesses.
“Supported by strong growth in our Dublin office to complement our UK team, we continue to take a lead in helping our clients navigate highly competitive and evolving market conditions, with a particular focus on digital disruption.”
Browne Jacobson’s award-winning specialist IP team advises on the full range of rights from patents, confidential information and designs to trademarks and copyright. Alongside its ranking by WTR 1000 ranking, the practice is also recognised by Managing Intellectual Property, IAM Patent 1000, Chambers and Legal 500.
The team has extensive experience assisting a premium client portfolio of some of the world’s leading global household names and luxury brands, including Mace Group, Lotus Cars, Match Group and ICONIC London. It is also regularly instructed to handle a number of the UK’s leading cases and has helped shape IP law in the UK and Europe.
You may be interested in...
Training
Register your interest to join our next Home Delivery Academy
Opinion
Forced labour goods: a landmark decision
Legal Update
ASA bans “misleading” Huel and ZOE ads endorsed by Dragon’s Den Star
Guide
Guidance for manufacturers of EVs and HEVs in the UK: ASA's non-exhaustive electric vehicle advertising guidance
Opinion
New hope for the manufacturing sector?
Guide
EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act: Guide for your business
Legal Update
(Deep)fake it till you make it? The ASA's role in regulating false celebrity endorsements
Press Release
Jeanne Kelly recognised in the list of Top 100 people in Irish Tech by the Business Post
Press Release
New resource will support university innovation
Legal Update
A reflection of FIMA Connect 2024
Press Release
Browne Jacobson wins UK Impact Case of the Year at the Managing IP EMEA Awards 2024
Legal Update
Forest Risk Commodities regulations: Steps food businesses should take
Legal Update
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
Press Release
Browne Jacobson Ireland LLP rank across Dispute Resolution, Intellectual Property and Technology in the Legal 500 EMEA 2024
Legal Update
Artificial intelligence – shaping a sustainable future
Legal Update
ASA ruling on Calvin Klein FKA Twigs advertisement
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked in World Trademark Review 2024
Legal Update
Veganism and manufacturing: IP protection
Legal Update
Veganism and manufacturing: Advertising pitfalls
Legal Update
The rise of AI in construction
Legal Update
An update on the independent review of university spin-out companies
On-Demand
Copyright issues with AI webinar
Published Article
The reasons for asset-based lending’s growing acceptance as a preferred funding source
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s patent litigation team praised for being “dynamic” and a “major player” in IAM Patent 1000 guide
Legal Update
Harnessing the potential of knowledge exchange, research and innovation
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise on international sale of entertainment company Music For Pets
Opinion
Practical points from High Court ruling that Tesco has infringed Lidl’s IP rights in its famous yellow circle logo
Legal Update
Knowledge exchange and intellectual property
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
Press Release
Court of Appeal makes plea for legally enforceable arbitration for FRAND disputes
In the ongoing complex litigation between Optis Cellular Technology LLC and Apple Inc., the Court of Appeal ([2022] EWCA Civ 1411) has upheld the High Court’s findings that implementers of standard-essential patents (SEPs) cannot refuse to accept a FRAND license and continue activities in the meantime which constitute infringement: that party must commit to accept a court-determined license if it wishes to avoid an injunction.
Published Article
AI generated designs on retail products
Every AI will have its own terms of use. DALL·E 2’s Terms of Use dated 3 November 2022 specify that as between a user and Open AI, a user owns their prompts and uploads. Open AI also assigns to the user all rights in any images generated by DALL·E 2 for that user (subject to the user complying with those Terms of Use, and to a licence to use inputs and output to develop and improve the services).
Published Article
Bruce Willis AI and the problem with deepfakes
A deepfake of Bruce Willis is advertising Russian mobile phones. Many great artistic and metaphysical questions are raised by this performance. However, this article is going to look at the intellectual property law implications, from a UK perspective.
Legal Update
Creating a profitable future for your university intellectual property
On-Demand
NFTs and Smart Contracts - an in-house lawyers perspective
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s IP experts shine silver in world’s leading trade mark lawyer rankings
Opinion
Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?
In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.
Published Article
Tipping the balance: Assessing patent infringement
In July this year, four years to the month after its introduction into UK law in the Supreme Court’s seminal judgment in Actavis v Eli Lilly, the court handed down its latest decision applying the ‘doctrine of equivalents’.