Gerard Hanratty, Head of Health and Life Sciences at UK and Ireland law firm Browne Jacobson, which has represented core participants in many nationally significant public inquiries, including Grenfell, said:
“The government’s commitment to meeting all 58 recommendations of the Grenfell Inquiry reiterates the importance of creating a central repository to record and monitor the implementation of recommendations made by public inquiries, a need highlighted by the House of Lords Statutory Inquiries Committee report into enhancing public trust.
“At organisational level, particularly within the large institutions that are often the subject of inquiries and receiving such a high volume of recommendations, it’s clear there are significant hurdles to making the required changes, with auditing requirements being burdensome and disproportionate accountability frameworks between junior and senior staff.
“The adoption of emerging technologies of AI should help with identifying issues before they arise, while the planned creation of a leadership and management framework within the NHS points the way forward to how standards can be upheld.
“Any national oversight body for implementing inquiry recommendations should also ensure these are prioritised accordingly to help organisations handle the level of changes required.
“By taking these steps, the government can help ensure public inquiries succeed in delivering on their objectives, which is to make meaningful change where there have been institutional failings.”
Contact
Kara Shadbolt
Senior PR & Communication Manager
kara.shadbolt@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 1111
Discover more
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
EGZ v Hertfordshire County Council and others: The challenges of tackling CSE on the frontline and through litigation
Newsletter guidance for healthcare providers on PSIRF and inquests
The Public Office (Accountability) Bill: A new era for inquests, inquiries and public accountability
Preparing for the Casey Inquiry: The importance of language
The Orgreave public inquiry: Background and significance
National inquiry into child grooming: What does this mean for insurers?
Legal project management: A cornerstone in operational delivery of inquiries
Analysis: National audit on group-based child sexual exploitation and abuse (June 2025)
Browne Jacobson comments on the government's 10 year infrastructure strategy
What might the public inquiry on child sexual exploitation look like
Investigations and inquiries into child sexual exploitation and grooming
Browne Jacobson to explore skills challenges in built environment at UKREiiF event
Making public inquiry recommendations work
Martyn’s Law: Implications for public authorities
Browne Jacobson returns to UKREiiF 2025
Comment on government's response to Grenfell Inquiry
Government proposals to enhance public trust in the public inquiry process
Government's announcement on child grooming inquiries: What local authorities need to know
Calls for public inquiry into child sexual exploitation intensify amidst political pressure
Martyn’s Law: Paving the way for enhanced security measures across UK venues and events
What the UK Covid-19 Inquiry means for schools
Browne Jacobson to lead discussions on the future of real estate and infrastructure at this year’s UKREiiF 2024 event
Subsidy control lessons to be learnt from Bulb
What role do HE employees have to play in public inquiries?
Public matters - January 2023
Coroner’s refusal to issue a Prevention of Future Deaths Report following death in prison custody inquest was lawful
Covid 19 public inquiry
The start of the public inquiry into Covid-19 in the UK has moved one step closer with the appointment on December 17 2021 of Baroness Heather Hallett to chair the inquiry. The inquiry was announced in May last year and is due to start in the spring of 2022.