0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

competition law and IP agreements

4 May 2018

There is a natural tension between (intellectual property) IP rights and competition law. On the one hand, IP rights grant a legal monopoly to the holder, while on the other hand, competition laws seek to control restrictive agreements and the use/abuse of a monopoly position.

In this practical webinar we provided an overview of the application of competition law to IP agreements and in particular:

  • a general overview of competition law and the consequences of not complying with the law
  • the application of the law in relation to restrictive agreements (Article 101(1) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Chapter I of the Competition Act) to IP licences and the availability of block exemption 'safe harbours' 
  • common competition law pitfalls and areas to watch out for when drafting IP agreements.

Download and share the slides

focus on...

Brexit resources

Contract drafting and Brexit: considerations for local authorities

As Brexit Day inches closer there are many things for local authorities to consider. One of which is whether contracts already in place or currently being negotiated will still be accurate or support council business after Brexit.

View brexit resources

Upcoming webinars

Parallel imports what brand and IP owners need to know

Parallel importers seek to exploit price differentials for goods sold in different countries.

View

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

Legal updates

“Utterly horrified” masters and “blatantly inadmissible” evidence

The sole result for a search on Westlaw for the phrase “utterly horrified” is an interesting decision from Mr Justice Arnold on June 12 2019 about evidence in passing off proceedings.

View

The opinions expressed on this video are provided for the purposes of general interest and information and should not be relied upon. They contain only summaries of aspects of the subject matter at the time of publishing and do not provide comprehensive statements of the law. They do not constitute legal advice and do not provide a substitute for it. So why not talk to us and seek advice that's tailored to you? You can look up one of our experts on this website or call on 0370 270 6000.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up