0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

company dividends – possible legal reforms?

1 April 2019

Commercial companies are well-versed in the legal considerations and processes involved in the declaration and payment of dividends to their shareholders – typically going through the required steps once or twice year. However, over recent months there have been signs that wholesale changes to the UK dividend regime might be on the horizon.

The recent Court of Appeal case of BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and others [2019] EWCA Civ 112 (the Sequana case) has been a key talking point for corporate and insolvency lawyers (although at the time of writing it is not clear whether the decision will be appealed). The Sequana case held that it is legally possible for a dividend to be lawful under UK company law and yet also capable of being a transaction defrauding creditors under the Insolvency Act 1986. The Sequana case also gave guidance about how ‘insolvent’ a company must be for the duties of a board of directors to switch from being owed to its shareholders to being owed to its creditors.

The Sequana case seems indicative of an increasing trend of looking outside of Part 23 of the Companies Act 2006 for ways to overturn a previously declared dividend. Historically, unlawful dividend arguments tended to hinge on a company having inadequate distributable reserves or breaching a technical requirement of company law, such as the requirement to prepare (and, in the case of public companies, to file) interim accounts in certain circumstances. Given that the government has also indicated (as part of recent consultations) that it is considering an overhaul of the dividend regime in the near future commentators are suggesting that there perhaps seems to be a direction of travel towards a solvency based dividend regime rather than one based on distributable reserves.

This view has been supported by a recent BEIS Committee publication on "The Future of Audit - Nineteenth Report of Session 2017-19" which also contains some interesting commentary on dividends. This publication states that:

  • Auditors should be prepared to challenge management on their accounting of realised profits and distributable reserves
  • Government and the Financial Reporting Council should urgently produce a clear, simple and prudent definition of what counts as realised profits for the purpose of distributions – and the report supports defining realised profits as realised in cash or near cash
  • Companies should be required to disclose the balance of distributable reserves in their annual accounts and break down profits between realised and unrealised
  • Government should adopt a complementary solvency-based system in which directors must state that dividend payments will not make the company insolvent or create cash flow problems. This would complement a revised capital maintenance regime that the report recommends.

Changes therefore appear to be in the pipeline. Watch this space to see how things develop.

training and events

25Feb

Child Abuse Claims – Design your own Redress Schemes and Codes of Conduct seminar Manchester office

We are delighted to invite you to attend our next social care forum.

View event

4Mar

Private sector development club Nottingham office

We are pleased to invite you to our next private sector development club. At this session we will guide you through a fictional development scenario – covering site acquisition, resolving title issues, negotiating a development agreement and the role of collateral warranties.

View event

focus on...

Legal updates

Public matters - February 2020

This month includes public procurement, planning, the Clean Air Bill, rent regulation, and in loco parentis in schools.

View

Legal updates

Local planning authorities may now agree to extend the time period for determining prior approval applications

On 31 January 2020 the High Court handed down judgment in Gluck v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government [2020] EWHC 161 Admin

View

Legal updates

Should heading the ball be banned in football lessons?

It is an accepted fact that a school owes their pupils a duty to take reasonable care of their safety.

View

Legal updates

Social value in procurement

The Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012 extends public bodies’ thinking beyond the financial costs of a contract and makes them evaluate how the services they procure might improve the economic, social and environment wellbeing of an area.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up