0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Government confronts unfair practices in the leasehold market

18 January 2018

In August 2017 we published an article on the upcoming consultation proposing reforms to tackle ‘unfair practices in the leasehold market’. The consultation, which ran until 19 September 2017, has since received over 6,000 responses from freeholders, tenants and developers, signifying the high interest in the issue. Escalating ground rents and the sale of freeholds as investment vehicles for specialist companies have reportedly left homeowners unable to sell their homes and has led to a significant amount of publicity, leading to the Government issuing this consultation on legal reform.

The Government’s response to the consultation has proposed the following changes:

1. Leasehold ban

The sale of new leases on residential houses (no mention of flats) will no longer be permitted except where this is necessary, for example shared ownership or to preserve buildings of architectural or historical importance. This will be applied to new and existing freehold houses but not to developments already being constructed where leases have already been granted at the date of the consultation response.

2. Help to Buy

The Government wishes to strongly discourage the use of Help to Buy equity loans for the purchase of leasehold houses in advance of any new legislation.

3. Ground rents and lease extensions

Ground rents for new leases of houses and flats will be reserved to zero or a peppercorn (meaning no rent at all) will be applied to leasehold properties.

4. Existing leasehold properties

There will be reforms to make purchasing a freehold or extending a lease much simpler, faster and cheaper. The sale of properties on a leasehold basis could still be permitted but there are proposals for a simplified formula for calculating leasehold buyouts and lease extensions, which is predicted to be in place by the end of 2018. There will be a further consultation on this. Additionally, leasehold owners could be given the right of first refusal, if the landlord wants to sell the freehold.

There are plans to provide leaseholders with clear support on the various routes to redress available to them (e.g. negligence claims against conveyancers) and encouraging developers to continue support schemes for homeowners effected by excessive ground rents. Also, the Government is looking at closing a 'loophole' to prevent mandatory possession orders being sought when leaseholders are classed as assured tenants under Ground 8, Schedule 2, Housing Act 1988. Under the existing rules, if ground rent exceeds £250 per year or £1000 per year in London, the lease can be classified as an assured tenancy and the grounds for possession become available.

5. Equivalent rights for freeholders on managed estates

At present owners of freehold houses on estates with shared facilities, such as open areas and estate roads, do not have the same rights as tenants of leasehold houses to challenge the reasonableness of service charges. The Government is proposing equivalent rights to challenge unfair service charges to ensure they are reasonable when paying for the use of communal areas and facilities in mixed use estates or private developments.

The Government is also considering changes to rentcharges to prevent the owner of a rentcharge from being able to take possession of the property for non-payment.

6. The re-invigoration of commonhold as an alternative tenure and unfair terms in residential leasehold

The Law Commission have been tasked with a project to consider how commonhold can be made to work as originally intended. The consultation highlights that a key reason for the failure of the commonhold is due to the financial incentives for developers in building leasehold.

The Government also propose to work with the Law Commission to consider whether unfair terms apply when a lease is sold on to a new leaseholder. The Law Commission proposes to look at lease terms, particularly “cases where ground rents increase exponentially, high-fixed service charges and fees on assignment.”

The timetable for these changes is unclear, leaving doubts as to whether there is enough parliamentary time to address these changes with sufficient vigour in the current political climate. There is a lot of public pressure for change so it appears inevitable now that there will be some legislation to address the issues raised in the consultation, but the Government needs to ensure that legislation is not rushed through without sufficient consideration to the impact it will have on housing development.

It is perhaps timely that the long running legal battle and pending Court of Appeal decision in Mundy v the Sloane over the calculation basis for extending a lease is due (at time of writing we had not seen a decision). This case involves a flat in Chelsea with a lease term of less than 23 years remaining. The freeholder is seeking £420,000 to agree a lease extension. If a ruling is given in favour of Mundy, the tenant, the cost of extending a lease or buying a freehold could be dramatically reduced. The form in which the valuation models for lease extensions and freehold purchases will take remains undecided. For the interim, leaseholders are left with little option than to wade through the developing case law to ascertain whether they are receiving a fair bargain.

We of course await draft legislation and it is not clear when legislation will actually be enacted and implemented. However, the consultation is likely to have an immediate impact on the market as it raises awareness and removes the element of surprise around not owning the freehold, which was a theme of the reply to the consultation. Consequently, buyers may be hesitant to accept new houses sold on leasehold basis or those subject to ground rents. However, existing leaseholders could remain the most affected as mortgage companies become more reluctant to lend against those properties, making them unsellable. The Government has pointed to this in its reply to the consultation but it remains to be seen what legislation might follow that helps existing leaseholders.

training and events


Child Abuse Claims – Design your own Redress Schemes and Codes of Conduct seminar Manchester office

We are delighted to invite you to attend our next social care forum.

View event


Private sector development club Nottingham office

We are pleased to invite you to our next private sector development club. At this session we will guide you through a fictional development scenario – covering site acquisition, resolving title issues, negotiating a development agreement and the role of collateral warranties.

View event

focus on...

Legal updates

Local planning authorities may now agree to extend the time period for determining prior approval applications

On 31 January 2020 the High Court handed down judgment in Gluck v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government [2020] EWHC 161 Admin


Legal updates

Social value in procurement

The Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012 extends public bodies’ thinking beyond the financial costs of a contract and makes them evaluate how the services they procure might improve the economic, social and environment wellbeing of an area.


Legal updates

Should heading the ball be banned in football lessons?

It is an accepted fact that a school owes their pupils a duty to take reasonable care of their safety.


Legal updates

Advocate General opinion broadens scope of the public procurement exemption

A recent opinion from the Advocate General in the case of Informatikgesellschaft für Software-Entwicklung (ISE) mbH v Stadt Köln (ISE Case), has appeared to widen the scenarios in which contracting authorities can look to rely on the exemption contained with Regulation 12(7) of the Public Contract Regulations 2015 (PCR).


The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up