Please sign in with your existing account details.
Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.
Privacy statement - Terms and conditions
Forgotten your password?
You have exceeded the maximum number of login attempts for this email address and your account has been locked. An email has been sent to member of Browne Jacobson's web team and some one will be contacting you over the next two working days with details of how to change your password.
Are you sure you want to remove this item from you pinned content?
Since April 2016 UK limited companies have been required to keep a new statutory register – a register of people with significant control (known as a PSC register). This captures information about who ultimately controls such companies or otherwise exercises significant influence over them. The information contained in a company’s PSC register must be made publicly available at Companies House when a company’s confirmation statement (formerly annual return) is filed.
Many companies are still getting to grips with this new requirement – and now by virtue of the EU Fourth Money Laundering Directive (4MLD) – which (as things stand) is scheduled to be implemented in EU member states by 26 June 2017 – there are more changes on the way that will affect the UK’s PSC regime. Brexit will not impact on the initial implementation of this Directive – whilst the UK remains a full member of the EU it must continue to apply EU legislation.
The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) has recently issued a discussion paper on the transposition of Article 30 of 4MLD relating to the beneficial ownership of corporate and other entities. The UK’s PSC regime is consistent with most of the requirements of Article 30 of 4MLD, but will need amending in certain respects in order to be compliant.
BEIS considers that changes may be needed in the following areas:
For new entities subject to the PSC regime it is proposed that information on beneficial ownership will be publicly accessible in a similar manner to that of the PSC register (at Companies House).
It is also envisaged that the legal offences and penalties which currently relate to the domestic PSC regime should apply to the new entities brought within the scope in order to ensure consistency.
The deadline for responses to the discussion paper is 16 December 2016; we will publish a further update once the outcome of this is known.
In January this year, the ICO announced that it issued more than £1m in penalties since last April to firms breaking marketing rules and that a further £2m of penalties were in the pipeline. This workshop will provide you with practical, legal and tactical advice on managing ICO investigations.
This claims club is devoted entirely to issues that touch upon the handling of abuse claims – our specialist team will update you on the initiative being run by Master McCloud to introduce a protocol specifically for claims of historical abuse.
Where someone’s private information has been disclosed, how do you determine the compensation they should receive?
Lord Justice Jackson is currently reviewing whether fixed recoverable costs (FRC) should be introduced in all civil claims with a value up to £250,000.
The High Court has recently issued its decision on damages in the case of Energy Solutions EU Limited v Nuclear Decommissioning Authority  EWHC 3326 (TCC).
Useful clarification on applying paragraph 89 of the National Planning Policy Framework to applications for development within the Green Belt.
The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.
Professional Development Lawyer
Keep up with the latest content from Browne Jacobson:
© Copyright Browne Jacobson LLP 2017 - All rights reserved