already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

persons with significant control - more changes on the way

21 November 2016

Since April 2016 UK limited companies have been required to keep a new statutory register – a register of people with significant control (known as a PSC register). This captures information about who ultimately controls such companies or otherwise exercises significant influence over them. The information contained in a company’s PSC register must be made publicly available at Companies House when a company’s confirmation statement (formerly annual return) is filed.

Many companies are still getting to grips with this new requirement – and now by virtue of the EU Fourth Money Laundering Directive (4MLD) – which (as things stand) is scheduled to be implemented in EU member states by 26 June 2017 – there are more changes on the way that will affect the UK’s PSC regime. Brexit will not impact on the initial implementation of this Directive – whilst the UK remains a full member of the EU it must continue to apply EU legislation.

The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) has recently issued a discussion paper on the transposition of Article 30 of 4MLD relating to the beneficial ownership of corporate and other entities. The UK’s PSC regime is consistent with most of the requirements of Article 30 of 4MLD, but will need amending in certain respects in order to be compliant.

BEIS considers that changes may be needed in the following areas:

  • The scope of the entities required to obtain and keep PSC information: it is proposed that the scope of the PSC regime will be extended to all entities incorporated in the UK and capable of having a beneficial owner. BEIS is also considering whether companies with shares admitted to trading on certain markets (such as AIM) should be within the scope of the PSC regime – they are currently excluded. Co-operative and community benefit societies, building societies, friendly societies, CIOs and Royal Chartered Bodies and others might also find themselves within the scope of the PSC regime following the outcome of the discussion paper
  • Who is regarded as a beneficial owner and what information needs to be collected: it is proposed that the current significant control tests will remain and will simply be adapted to fit with the structure of any new entities brought within the scope of the PSC regime
  • The frequency with which information about PSCs has to be updated at Companies House: a new obligation is proposed – this would require all entities to update their PSC information within six months of a change occurring (rather than annually via the confirmation statement as is currently the case). This proposal is in response to the requirement in 4MLD that the central register is “adequate, accurate and current” – it was not considered that an annual filing requirement would satisfy this. This will result in an additional administrative burden on entities caught by the PSC regime and seems contrary to the domestic “red tape challenge” which has sought to ease company administration.

For new entities subject to the PSC regime it is proposed that information on beneficial ownership will be publicly accessible in a similar manner to that of the PSC register (at Companies House).

It is also envisaged that the legal offences and penalties which currently relate to the domestic PSC regime should apply to the new entities brought within the scope in order to ensure consistency.

The deadline for responses to the discussion paper is 16 December 2016; we will publish a further update once the outcome of this is known.

training and events

17Oct

Patents update 2017

Hear from leading patent lawyers from Browne Jacobson and patent attorneys from Barker Brettell

View event

31Oct

Public sector planning club

This seminar will look at the key issues affecting planning in the public sector.

View event

focus on...

Legal updates

Prison healthcare at fever pitch

The UK prison system reached fever pitch when, in August this year. An NHS England spokesperson conceded to the Guardian newspaper that conditions can be “challenging” despite the annual £500m funding it presides over, committed to associated health and justice services.

View

Legal updates

Vesting of highways and ownership of the land

The recent case of London Borough of Southwark and the City of London v Transport for London [2017] EWCA Civ 1220 has provided a timely reminder of the limited vertical extent of highways vested in a highways authority under section 263 of the Highways Act 1980 (The ‘1980 Act’).

View

Legal updates

Procurement, not-for-profit organisations and remedies...

Following our last update in July 2016, a further decision has been reached in the case of Perinatal Institute (PI) and Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP)[2017] EWHC 1876 (TTC).

View

Guides

Browne Jacobson's guide to public sector commercialisation

With ever more ambitious financial targets being set by central government, the need to look at different ways to make savings, safeguard services and generate income are becoming more important for local authorities, and even central government departments, to some degree.

View guides

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Emma Grant

Emma Grant

Professional Development Lawyer

View profile