0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

recovery of future losses as a result of a prepayment - watch the drafting!

18 October 2012

In an early termination situation lenders sometimes look to recover lost income during the remainder of the term - this is particularly relevant to ABLs and invoice financiers. This case does not say recovery cannot be made but does make it clear that the wording of the indemnity is crucial.

The recent case of K/S Preston Street v Santander (UK) plc [2012] EWHC 1633 (Ch) considered a loan agreement which permitted prepayment but provided that the borrower would, in addition to any prepayment fee, indemnify the bank against any losses that were incurred due to the prepayment of the loan before the maturity date. This included the loss of fees and interest during the remainder of the term. The High Court held that, under the indemnity, the bank could recover the losses incurred up to the date the loan was prepaid, but could not recover anticipated future losses.

The reason given for the decision was that the agreement itself did not explicitly provide for the recovery of future estimated losses under the indemnity, therefore this could not be claimed by the bank. Given prepayment was permitted by the agreement, the bank could not recover losses calculated on the basis of a breach of contract and so its entitlement to recovery was limited by the scope of the indemnity.

The learning point is that drafting indemnities needs to be carefully considered if the expectation is recovery of future estimated losses for a permitted course of action (i.e. prepayment) under an agreement.

training and events

24Oct

Claims Club Manchester office

We will be discussing the Human Rights Act, school claims and a legal update on 'hot topics'.

View event

focus on...

Legal updates

Foster carers are not ‘workers’ according to the Employment Tribunal

For anyone who has followed the evolving case law in the social care sector, this title is likely to raise some questions. Most notably, “What about the decision in Armes?”

View

Brexit resources

More concerns on the horizon for social care services and private providers

In a survey conducted by Unison this summer more than half of our social workers say they are considering leaving the profession for a less stressful position.

View brexit resources

Upcoming webinars

Care Quality Commission and health & care regulatory update

Carl May-Smith will provide an update on CQC & Competitions & Markets Authority enforcement, a recent Tribunal decision on the registration of learning disability & autism services and the latest in CQC’s review of restraint, seclusion and segregation.

View

Upcoming webinars

How to commercialise your IP: licensing, spin outs and JVs

Our expert panel, comprised of IP and corporate law specialists, will be discussing IP commercialisation strategies, their benefits and pitfalls, drawing on experience across the private, public and higher education sectors.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up