0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

government re-affirms abolition of distress for rent

22 February 2012
The Government has launched a public consultation which has confirmed its intention to abolish distress for rent (recovery of arrears of rent by seizure of the tenants goods) and replace it with a modern regime to recover commercial rent arrears.

Following the announcement of the new consultation process on bailiff law in mid-January 2012, there had been some doubt whether the long-delayed plans to abolish landlords common law remedy of distress for rent were to be abandoned. No longer. The new consultation document re-affirms the Governments commitment to bring the new system of Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR) into force and to abolish distress for rent altogether.

This will be of interest both to property owners and occupiers. Anecdotally, landlords have increased their use of distress against struggling tenants (particularly retailers) in the faltering commercial letting market, as forfeiting the lease would often leave them with an expensive void. Concerns have been raised by landlords that CRAR (particularly the requirement to give the debtor notice prior to taking control of goods) would impede the effective recovery of rent arrears. This is one of several areas on which views are now sought.

The consultation also foreshadows the implementation of the other changes under Part 3 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. It remains the Governments intention to unify the existing law relating to seizure and sale of goods for most purposes (including the recovery of rent arrears, non-domestic rates and judgment debts). Bailiffs and enforcement officers are to be known as enforcement agents. It is proposed that they will continue to be able to enforce the payment of rent arrears, other debts and fines but there is to be more protection against aggressive bailiffs and bailiffs conduct is to be more tightly regulated. That is perhaps not surprising given that bailiffs and distress for rent are governed by various laws, one of which dates back to 1689.

Schedule 12 to the 2007 Act will set new prescriptive and comprehensive procedures for seizing goods, to be known as taking control of goods, which will regulate the process all the way from the serving of a notice and seizure through to the distribution of the sale proceeds.

If you require any further information about distress, or the recovery of rental arrears please contact Kate Andrews.

training and events

17Sep

In-house lawyers' update Manchester office

Our next in-house lawyers' sessions will give in-house lawyers the tools and strategies for dealing with some of the problems caused by recent changes to the law.

View event

25Sep

In-house lawyers' update Nottingham office

Our next in-house lawyers' sessions will give in-house lawyers the tools and strategies for dealing with some of the problems caused by recent changes to the law.

View event

focus on...

Upcoming webinars

Exclusions: keeping you informed

Earlier this year Edward Timpson’s review on school exclusions raised the profile of the practice of exclusions, managed moves and alternative provision.

View

Legal updates

Effective OJEU contract notice defeats claim for declaration of ineffectiveness

High Court dismissed a claim for a declaration of ineffectiveness for a contract entered into by Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council (the Council) and Newriver Leisure Limited (NLL) for a major regeneration scheme on Basingstoke Leisure Park.

View

Upcoming webinars

Parallel imports what brand and IP owners need to know

Parallel importers seek to exploit price differentials for goods sold in different countries.

View

Legal updates

Contingent loss in negligence claims

Contingent loss is relevant to limitation; specifically, the date at which a claimant’s cause of action accrues for the purposes of a claim in the tort of negligence (as many claims against professional advisers are framed).

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up