0370 270 6000

Consultation on HSE proposal to extend cost recovery

26 September 2011

Three month consultation launched

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has launched a three month consultation on proposals to extend the scope of cost recovery from businesses that are found to be in material breach of health and safety laws.

The HSE states in its consultation paper that "it is reasonable that duty holders that are found to be in serious material breach in standards - rather than the taxpayer - should bear the related costs incurred by the regulator in helping them put things right."

A material breach has been defined within the consultation as "when, in the opinion of the inspector, there has been a breach of health and safety law which requires them to make a formal intervention."

Under the proposals the HSE will be under a statutory duty to recover costs from businesses where the HSE has had to formally intervene in writing, such as through an improvement or prohibition notice, due to a material breach. It is proposed that an hourly fee for intervention will apply - £133 per hour - to be used by all staff working on interventions. The estimated average cost for inspection which results in a letter is estimated to be £750 with potential costs of tens of thousands of pounds being envisaged in "extreme" cases.

Although health and safety work is carried out both by the HSE and local authorities, the proposals at present do not place a duty on local authorities to recover its intervention costs. However, this may change depending on what feedback the HSE receives to the consultation paper.

It should be noted that only where there has been a serious material breach will the duty fall on the HSE to recover costs, not where the breach has been a technical non-material one or where it is held that there has not been a breach at all. Any costs beyond the formal intervention, such as if a prosecution follows, will not be affected by the new proposals, with such costs to be recovered through the courts as usual.

The HSE has stated its intention to invoice businesses for their costs and for payment to be made within 30 days. Failure to make payments on time will result in the usual commercial recovery process, including court proceedings to recover costs if necessary. However, in order to assist with cash flow the HSE intends to invoice on a regular basis, rather than one large invoice after an intervention has taken place, but will then refund or credit a business for any fees paid if it is later held that there has not been a serious material breach.

The HSE would deal with any queries and disputes regarding costs to be recovered by setting up a resolution procedure. However, where the dispute is not upheld, the HSE would seek to recover its costs for handling the dispute.

The new proposals will apply to small businesses and new startups, in spite of the three year moratorium on new regulations announced in March 2011, although only in situations where material breaches have put any persons health and safety at risk, including employees.

The consultation is accepting responses up until 14 October 2011, with the new regime intended to come into place on 6 April 2012, subject to successful passage through Parliament.

On a practical point, if costs recovery becomes law, businesses will need to be mindful of their dealings with the HSE on a routine level. A routine inspection/visit could become costly and therefore the way in which routine visits are managed is likely to become a much more involved process on the part of senior managers. The aim will be to avoid a finding of "material" breach which may require more robust representations being made at an early stage. Businesses will also want to be mindful of the investigation process and what is involved on the part of the HSE in order to successfully challenge any costs recovery.

Such a change in approach will need to be carefully thought out with much more emphasis being placed on looking forward to the potential consequences of disclosure of information. Whilst the intention would be to avoid a finding of material breach, the consequence could be to provide evidence of potential breaches of the law.

Focus on...

Legal updates

Shared Insights: The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework

In our latest Shared Insights session, Patient Safety Incident Response Framework, chaired by Amelia Newbold, Nicola Evans and Damian Whitlam, we were pleased to be joined by Lauren Mosley, Head of Patient Safety Implementation, NHS England and Tracey Herlihey, Head of Patient Safety Incident Response Policy, NHS England. The discussion covered a number of topics including the key elements of PSIRF, points for Trusts to consider including disclosure, and feedback from an early adopter Trust. For more information and details of how we can help, you can download the note at the link below.

View

Published articles

Assaults on staff - how can schools reduce the risk?

The risk of assault against staff is, sadly, something that all schools need to consider carefully. Here one legal expert explains what they can do to protect staff and ensure they fulfil their duty of care.

View

Blogs

NHS England – Assuring and supporting complex change

NHS England has issued an updated (publication 11 October 2022) suite of Complex Change guidance about how it will assure and support proposals for complex change that are reportable to it. New and (where it is still in force) existing Complex Change guidance are as follows.

View

Blogs

HSE inspection of asbestos in schools

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) have announced they will be carrying out a programme of inspections to primary and secondary school establishments from September 2022. The inspections will assess how schools are managing the risks from asbestos and meeting the Duty to Manage requirements, set out in Regulation 4 of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up