0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

employees can retrospectively switch annual leave to sick leave rules ECJ

16 September 2009

Employees who cannot take their holiday entitlement because of sickness, or who are sick during their holiday, must be allowed to take their holiday at some other time, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled.

The ECJs decision follows the Stringer case earlier this year where the court ruled that an employee who could not take annual leave due to continuous sickness absence could carry their holiday entitlement over to the next holiday year under the working time directive. However, it did not tackle the issue of what happens if sickness absence coincides with planned annual leave which was the subject of the case Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA.

The facts of the case

In the case of Pereda v Madrid Movilidad SA, Mr Pereda was scheduled to take holiday but was involved in an accident shortly before it was due to start and was subsequently unable to work. He asked for a new period of annual leave but his employer refused.

What was the ECJ asked to consider?

The ECJ was asked whether, when a period of annual leave coincides with a temporary disability following an accident at work, the employee may change his period of leave, if necessary, to another leave year.

And the decision?

The ECJ ruled that an employee on sick leave during a period of previously scheduled annual leave has the right, on request after returning from the absence, to take that annual leave at another time. If the employee cannot take this re-scheduled leave in the particular leave year, they are entitled to carry that forward into the next leave year.

The ECJs rationale was that the purpose of annual leave - "to rest and enjoy a period of relaxation and leisure" - was different from the purpose of sick leave - "to recover from being ill".

Implications?

The decision as to whether annual leave is taken during sick leave is now one for the employee, not the employer - if the employee does not wish to take annual leave whilst off sick, that leave must be granted at another time. This can include a request to take the leave in a subsequent leave year and could therefore mean annual leave accrues over a number of years.

Employees may then take this accrued leave on their return to work or receive payment in lieu on the termination of their employment, which may lead employers to consider earlier dismissal than at present to avoid the accrual of annual leave.

It appears that Mr Pereda applied for a new period of annual leave over a month after his return to work. If this is correct, employees would not need to cancel their booked annual leave if they become sick, but could exercise their right to reschedule that leave at a later date.

This may make little difference to those employers who do not pay more than statutory sick pay, or only do so for a limited period. Employees of such employers probably would not want to switch annual leave to sick leave. However, employers with generous sick pay schemes are likely to see an increase in retrospective claims of illness while on holiday, which in many cases may be unverifiable.

As a result, employers may consider reviewing their sick pay schemes and may wish to revisit their sickness absence policies to require notification of any sickness absence whilst an employee is on holiday and/or to require a doctors certificate in these circumstances.

If you would like to read our previous bulletin on the Stringer case, please click here.

focus on...

In-House Lawyers

Covid-19 and the challenges associated with it grind on into a second wave. Not only that but there’s the prospect of Brexit and a looming recession ahead. It would be entirely forgivable not to be on top of the law right now. Watch our on-demand video where we discuss employment, furlough and data transfers.

View

Legal updates

Workers' health and safety

The coronavirus pandemic has shone a large spotlight on issues of health and safety at work, and the steps that individuals can take if they believe their employer is not providing a safe workplace.

View

Legal updates

Communication on extended Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS)

On Saturday 31 October 2020 the government announced that the furlough scheme (Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – CJRS) would be extended to 2 December 2020 and on 5 November 2020 made a further announcement to prolong the extension of the CJRS until 31 March 2021.

View

Legal updates

Face coverings – FAQs for retail, hospitality and leisure

September has seen the introduction of compulsory face coverings for staff working within the retail, leisure and hospitality sectors in England in attempts to reduce the spread of coronavirus.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Sarah Hooton

Sarah Hooton

Professional Development Lawyer

View profile

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up