0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Company Names Tribunal: first decision

18 December 2008

Following our recent bulletin relating to the new Company Names Tribunal, Coca Cola's claim, one of the first made under the new procedure, has now been heard.

The tribunal ruled that Coke Cola Limiteds name was sufficiently similar to the name Coca Cola, and that its use in the UK would be likely to mislead by suggesting a connection between Coca Cola and Coke Cola Limited. It therefore ordered that Coke Cola Limited change its name or appeal the decision by 3 January 2009.

The cost to Coca Cola of bringing the claim is unknown but it was awarded a contribution of £700 towards its costs by the tribunal. In addition, this decision has been given within a short time scale (just eight weeks from the claim being brought by Coca Cola), although this is due in part to the fact that Coke Cola Limited chose not to file a defence and contest the claim.

Prior to the inception of the Company Names Tribunal, Coca Cola would have had to rely on its rights of passing off and/or trade mark infringement in order to stop Coke Cola Limited from making the use of such name. These would have been likely to have taken a much longer period of time to resolve and attracted higher costs.

This result for Coca Cola highlights the helpful alternative to passing off and trade mark infringement proceedings which is now available to rights holders. The positive outcome will no doubt persuade other rights holders of the benefits, both in time and cost, of the new procedure and is likely to see the work of the tribunal increase substantially in the coming months.

focus on...

Legal updates

Vicarious liability for employers: mere opportunity does not in itself confer liability

On 1 April 2020 the Supreme Court gave judgment in WM Morrison Supermarkets v Various Claimants.

View

Legal updates

Supreme Court curbs the liability of employers for data breaches committed by their employees

In a judgment that will be welcomed by private and public sector employers throughout the country, the Supreme Court has today upheld the appeal in the Morrisons Supermarkets case about whether vicarious liability may arise for data protection breaches by a rogue employee. Read more here.

View

Public and Admin Law

In our administrative and public law webinar, a number of key members of the team will be providing an analysis of issues that matter to you.

View

Legal updates

Companies to receive a 3 month extension period to file accounts during COVID-19

As part of the Government’s package to support businesses to manage the impact of COVID-19, it has announced that companies will from today (25 March 2020) be given an additional 3 month period to file their accounts at Companies House.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Declan Cushley

Declan Cushley

Partner and Head of IP and Commercial Group

View profile

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up