0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Company Names Tribunal: first decision

18 December 2008

Following our recent bulletin relating to the new Company Names Tribunal, Coca Cola's claim, one of the first made under the new procedure, has now been heard.

The tribunal ruled that Coke Cola Limiteds name was sufficiently similar to the name Coca Cola, and that its use in the UK would be likely to mislead by suggesting a connection between Coca Cola and Coke Cola Limited. It therefore ordered that Coke Cola Limited change its name or appeal the decision by 3 January 2009.

The cost to Coca Cola of bringing the claim is unknown but it was awarded a contribution of £700 towards its costs by the tribunal. In addition, this decision has been given within a short time scale (just eight weeks from the claim being brought by Coca Cola), although this is due in part to the fact that Coke Cola Limited chose not to file a defence and contest the claim.

Prior to the inception of the Company Names Tribunal, Coca Cola would have had to rely on its rights of passing off and/or trade mark infringement in order to stop Coke Cola Limited from making the use of such name. These would have been likely to have taken a much longer period of time to resolve and attracted higher costs.

This result for Coca Cola highlights the helpful alternative to passing off and trade mark infringement proceedings which is now available to rights holders. The positive outcome will no doubt persuade other rights holders of the benefits, both in time and cost, of the new procedure and is likely to see the work of the tribunal increase substantially in the coming months.

focus on...

In-House Lawyers - 12 June 2020

On demand webinar, focusing on practical solutions to utilise from home in agreements and dealings with business, data and digital law and how covid-19 has changed legal privilege.

View

Legal updates

Demystifying the indemnity

We know that one of the most difficult and troublesome areas of contracts to navigate are indemnities and how they interplay with warranties and liabilities. This note is not intended to be chapter and verse. It is intended as a guide to help those working in-house to identify ‘red flags’ in contracts presented to them for review.

View

Legal updates

Cabinet Office advice for contractual behaviour which is impacted by the Covid-19 emergency

On the 7th May 2020, the Cabinet Office released its guidance on responsible contractual behaviour for both public and private sectors relating to the performance and enforcement of contracts which have been “materially impacted” by the coronavirus.

View

Legal updates

Commercial and FinTech update: 24 April 2020

The latest set of UK government financial bailout measures were announced on Monday, 20 April by HM Treasury and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, target Innovate UK’s R&D intensive small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

Declan Cushley

Declan Cushley

Partner and Head of IP and Commercial Group

View profile

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up