0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

government announces fast track reforms

25 July 2008

The Government this week confirmed it will increase the fast track limit to £25,000, but reform has been watered down by the announcement that procedural change will only apply to sub £10,000 claims relating to RTAs.

To find out about the impact of the changes try our "how will it affect you?" tool.

Defendants dealing with these claims now face the challenge of operating to an all new procedure within tight, non-negotiable deadlines. We will be working with clients to help manage this change and the pressures the new procedure will bring.

Whats new for low value RTA claims

The new process for RTA claims under £10,000 will include:

  • Five days for claimant to submit claim notification form, from the date the claimant solicitor has all relevant information
  • Non- extendable 15 days for defendant to respond in relation to liability
  • Introduction of settlement packs
  • Standardised figures for elements of special damages
  • Streamlined procedure to refer claims to a judge for decision on quantum
  • Fixed fees - the fee structure has yet to be confirmed, but it seems ATE insurance will be retained

Click here to see the procedure flowchart.

The availability of a simple process to refer a claim to a judge will provide a quick and cost effective means of having a dispute in relation to quantum resolved. It is however unfortunate that the reforms do not routinely envisage this decision being made on the papers alone.

Claims will fall outside the procedure if:

  • Insurers fail to comply with the strict 15 day deadline
  • They involve issues of contributory negligence or
  • Causation of injuries is called into question

These exceptions must be carefully and pragmatically applied by defendants and Insurers if they are to maximise the number of claims handled within the new scheme and thereby control claimant costs.

The question of costs has been referred to an Advisory Committee. This will be key to the effectiveness of the reforms. Sub £10,000 RTA claims are already subject to the predictive costs scheme, which has been successful in controlling costs. Fixed costs under the new procedure should reflect the streamlined nature of this new process and must also be pitched at a level which ensures claimants do not have an incentive to sidestep the process.

Broader reform?

The new claims process is limited to some of the most straightforward PI claims. However, since motor claims account for 75 of all claims, and the majority are of low value, the opportunity to reduce claims spend presented by these reforms should not be underestimated.

The challenge for defendants, insurers and their advisors is to make the process as effective as possible which may well encourage the Government to embark on a wider programme of reform.

Preparing for change

The reforms set demanding targets for defendants. The time for a decision on liability is slashed by 75 and any admission will be binding. The exclusion of claims from this scheme where liability is denied or where contributory negligence or causation is raised, will mean that decisions on these issues will increasingly be informed by the economics of a claim.

We are committed to supporting our defendant and insurer clients in meeting the operational challenges inherent in this reform.

Services we offer include:

  • Rapid response advice
  • Peak-demand support
  • Policy advice and insurer/insured mediation
  • Updates and advice on reforms
  • Awareness training

training and events

11Dec

Lunchtime learning session on Ocean Outdoor -v- London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham Nottingham office

The Court of Appeal has recently handed down judgment in Ocean Outdoor v London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham. Join us on our lunchtime learning session about this case.

View event

22Jan

Managing procurement risks and challenges Manchester office

Have you ever received a letter challenging a regulated procurement procedure? Has your authority ever had proceedings issued against it for breach of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015?

View event

focus on...

Care Quality Commission and health & care regulatory update 7 November

Carl May-Smith provides an update on CQC & Competitions & Markets Authority enforcement.

View

Legal updates

ECJ guidance on applying exclusions to potential problem bidders

Rebecca McLean reviews the case of Delta Antrepriză de Construcţii şi Montaj 93 SA v Compania Naţională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA, which highlights the European Court of Justice’s (ECJ’s) recent ruling on the interpretation of Article 57(4) of Directive 2014/24 (the public procurement directive), which provides useful clarification over when contracting authorities can apply exclusions grounds where an economic operator has been in default under a prior public contract.

View

Legal updates

Rising wage rates?

With an election now set for December 2019, wage rate announcements will be deferred until at least mid-December, if not January.

View

Legal updates

Social care - October 2019

Welcome to our social care newsletter for October 2019.

View

The content on this page is provided for the purposes of general interest and information. It contains only brief summaries of aspects of the subject matter and does not provide comprehensive statements of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not provide a substitute for it.

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up