0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

employment tribunal changes ahead

23 September 2020

It perhaps won’t come as any surprise to users of employment tribunals that there is currently a backlog – with the number of cases being dealt with rising by 26% since March, and expected to continue to rise with the end of the current Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme next month.

In an attempt to address this, the rules which govern employment tribunal proceedings are being amended with effect from 8 October, including allowing non-employment judges to hear certain claims and allowing “legal officers” to make certain determinations which are currently reserved to employment judges. Other changes are also being introduced to widen the circumstances where multiple claimants/respondents can use the same claim form or response form; to allow claim forms to be accepted despite errors in the conciliation details; to remove the need to publish online judgments dealing with dismissals on withdrawal; and to facilitate remote hearings.

The ACAS conciliation process is also to be simplified to change the default conciliation period from one month to 6 weeks (without extensions). These amendments will be introduced slightly later, in December.

There is clearly concern as to both current and future capacity within the employment tribunals and the amendments proposed are intended to simplify certain aspects of the system and redistribute some of the workload currently falling on employment judges. How quickly they will take effect – and in particular when non-employment judges or legal officers will be available – remains to be seen. With press reports of a backlog of 45,000 cases with the employment tribunal system, parties may still face considerable delays in the near future.

related opinions

Home Office Central Registry for modern slavery statement goes live - first universities publish statements

The Home Office recently launched a central registry for modern slavery statements. A growing number of educational organisations, including a number of universities, have published statements on the registry.

View blog

Equal pay at ASDA stores - appeal to the Supreme Court unsuccessful

35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.

View blog

Supreme Court confirms that sleep ins are not working time

The Supreme Court judgment represents the conclusion on whether or not “sleep in time” should be classified as working time, when calculating the National Minimum Wage (NMW).

View blog

Mencap case: No entitlement to National Minimum Wage for sleep-in shifts

In a pivotal and much anticipated judgment for the social care sector, the Supreme Court has ruled that workers are not entitled to the National Minimum Wage for all time spent on a sleep-in shift.

View blog

Sarah Hooton

Sarah Hooton

Professional Development Lawyer

View profile

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up