0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

8 June 2020

Unsurprisingly, in Gwynedd Council v Barrett, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. The Respondent appealed the first instance decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. The Employment Tribunal found the process unfair, considering that there was no consultation over the proposals by the appeal, no appeal against dismissal and the manner in which they were required to “apply for their own jobs”.

The Respondent’s appeal was dismissed by the EAT. The EAT held that whether or not the Respondent acted fairly in applying that process in the circumstances of this case was to be judged by an application of s.98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and that is what the Tribunal did. In doing so, it did not err in its understanding of the relationship between the Respondent and the Governing Bodies of the schools as set out in the relevant regulations.

In its reasoning, the EAT contrasted a “forward looking” selection process where alternative employment is considered, typically by competitive interview, for a newly created post and a process of consultation and selection. In this case, the Claimants were not asked to be interviewed for newly created posts, but rather for substantially similar positions. The exercise was not so much 'forward looking' but closer to a selection process from within a pool, with the Claimants applying for their own job back with no consultation or appeal.

Related opinions

Symptoms of menopause can constitute a disability

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) recently found that an employment tribunal was wrong to strike out a claim on grounds that menopausal symptoms did not amount to a disability under the Equality Act 2010 (Rooney v Leicester City Council).

View blog

Employment Appeal Tribunal rules no entitlement to pay for zero-hour worker during a period of suspension

In a recent case the Employment Appeal Tribunal determined that, as a zero-hour worker, the Claimant was not entitled to be paid whilst he was suspended pending an investigation into an allegation of misconduct.

View blog

Flexible working and leave for carers

The Government has launched a consultation today on potential changes to the statutory flexible working regime.

View blog

Importance of considering flexible working applications

An employment tribunal has awarded an employee almost £185,000 for indirect discrimination following a failure to adequately consider the employee’s flexible working request.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up