0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

redundancy: competitive interview processes

8 June 2020

Unsurprisingly, in Gwynedd Council v Barrett, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. The Respondent appealed the first instance decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. The Employment Tribunal found the process unfair, considering that there was no consultation over the proposals by the appeal, no appeal against dismissal and the manner in which they were required to “apply for their own jobs”.

The Respondent’s appeal was dismissed by the EAT. The EAT held that whether or not the Respondent acted fairly in applying that process in the circumstances of this case was to be judged by an application of s.98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and that is what the Tribunal did. In doing so, it did not err in its understanding of the relationship between the Respondent and the Governing Bodies of the schools as set out in the relevant regulations.

In its reasoning, the EAT contrasted a “forward looking” selection process where alternative employment is considered, typically by competitive interview, for a newly created post and a process of consultation and selection. In this case, the Claimants were not asked to be interviewed for newly created posts, but rather for substantially similar positions. The exercise was not so much 'forward looking' but closer to a selection process from within a pool, with the Claimants applying for their own job back with no consultation or appeal.

related opinions

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

Furlough scheme extended to October

The Chancellor announced on Tuesday 12th May 2020 that the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) is to be extended to the end of October.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up