0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

nuisance calls, end of the line for directors?

11 December 2018

The new Privacy and Electronic Communications (Amendments) Regulations 2018 which come into force later in December will empower the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) to impose fines of up to £500,000 on officers and to personally hold them account even where the company has dissolved.

Since April 2015, the Information Commissioner has been able to levy up to £500,000 on firms making unsolicited direct marketing calls under the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR), the highest of which was handed down last year at £400,000 to Kuerboom Communications.

These measures, however, have not deterred some directors from simply dissolving their companies when enforcement agencies come knocking, resulting in fines remaining unpaid. This is a common tactic employed by nuisance-call firms, and is largely responsible for the ICO’s poor collection rate at just 54% since 2010.

Personal liability for directors

  • This year, under existing disqualification provisions, five directors have already been struck-off for 30 years for contravening direct marketing call rules.
  • Whilst failure to adhere to disqualification orders could lead to a prison sentence, after successful proposals in November, the new Privacy and Electronic Communications (Amendments) Regulations 2018 which come into force later in December will empower the ICO to, in addition, impose fines of up to £500,000 on officers and to personally hold them account even where the company has dissolved.
  • The ICO’s increasing willingness to robustly enforce the present law on electronic communications provides a compelling reason to ensure businesses follow best practice and think twice before launching an email campaign.

related opinions

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Marriott International: a look behind the ICO’s £99m fine and what this means for corporate acquisitions

Last month, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) announced notice of its intention to fine (NOI) Marriott International, Inc. £99m for infringements of the GDPR.

View blog

SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement

On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up