0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Nuisance calls, end of the line for directors?

11 December 2018

The new Privacy and Electronic Communications (Amendments) Regulations 2018 which come into force later in December will empower the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) to impose fines of up to £500,000 on officers and to personally hold them account even where the company has dissolved.

Since April 2015, the Information Commissioner has been able to levy up to £500,000 on firms making unsolicited direct marketing calls under the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR), the highest of which was handed down last year at £400,000 to Kuerboom Communications.

These measures, however, have not deterred some directors from simply dissolving their companies when enforcement agencies come knocking, resulting in fines remaining unpaid. This is a common tactic employed by nuisance-call firms, and is largely responsible for the ICO’s poor collection rate at just 54% since 2010.

Personal liability for directors

  • This year, under existing disqualification provisions, five directors have already been struck-off for 30 years for contravening direct marketing call rules.
  • Whilst failure to adhere to disqualification orders could lead to a prison sentence, after successful proposals in November, the new Privacy and Electronic Communications (Amendments) Regulations 2018 which come into force later in December will empower the ICO to, in addition, impose fines of up to £500,000 on officers and to personally hold them account even where the company has dissolved.
  • The ICO’s increasing willingness to robustly enforce the present law on electronic communications provides a compelling reason to ensure businesses follow best practice and think twice before launching an email campaign.

Related opinions

Moratoriums

The new Part A1 moratorium was introduced partly in response to the Covid-19 pandemic and its impact on businesses. The moratorium is not intended to be used to simply delay the inevitable insolvency of a company, but rather to allow breathing space for that company to restructure and/or achieve an effective rescue.

View blog

Equal pay at ASDA stores - appeal to the Supreme Court unsuccessful

35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.

View blog

Covid-19 insolvency measures extension

From 26 March 2021 the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (Coronavirus) (Extension of the Relevant Period) Regulations 2021 will come into force with the effect of extending several of the temporary measures brought in by the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA).

View blog

Updated National Crime Agency (NCA) guidance: Shoot for better quality suspicious activity reports (SARs)

The National Crime Agency (NCA) published an updated guidance note for anti-money laundering supervisors targeted at improving the quality of suspicious activity reports (SARs) to make the best possible use of SARs and to minimise unnecessary delays, particularly where a defence against money laundering (DAML) has been sought.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up