0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

personal liability for whistleblowing unfair dismissal claims

23 October 2018

It is well understood that employers may be liable for whistleblowing related dismissals. Since 2013 individual workers have also been at risk of personal liability for their own actions, where those actions are taken in response to a protected disclosure by a co-worker, which causes their co-workers to suffer some form of detriment other than dismissal.

However, in the recent case of Timis V Osipov the Court of Appeal clarified that in relation to individuals a ‘detriment’ includes dismissals which in turn potentially places those individuals indirectly at risk of personal liability for losses sustained as a result of the dismissal.

In this particular case Mr Timis was one of the directors who recommended that Mr Osipov be summarily dismissed, because he had made a protected disclosure. The Court of Appeal here made a distinction between the dismissal itself and the ‘recommendation for dismissal’, which was itself a detriment directly leading to the unfair dismissal of Mr Osipov. As a result, Mr Timis was held to be liable for the loss of earnings sustained by Mr Osipov as a result of his recommendation (which exceeded £2m). The Court of Appeal was keen to point out that the extent of the personal liability of individuals for their actions, which cause co-workers to suffer a detriment, is not limited to actions short of dismissal.

This case places individuals involved in the dismissal process of other employees (e.g. acting as a witness, chairing the disciplinary hearing or, acting as investigating officer) at greater risk of personal liability. There is a statutory defence for individuals where their actions have been carried out in reliance on a statement by their employer that their actions shall not be in breach of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It is likely therefore that employees will be reluctant to support employers in respect of dismissals which may be connected to whistleblowing unless employers can offer the necessary assurance that their actions will not amount to a statutory breach. Clearly this will necessitate a careful legal analysis before the dismissal is carried out.

related opinions

Levy restrictions are killing learning

New research published today by the City & Guilds Group reveals that 92% of apprenticeship levy-paying employers want to see greater flexibility in how they can spend their apprenticeship allowance, with the rigidity of the current system holding many back.

View blog

Home Office to modernise right to work checks

In April 2018 a Right to Work Checking Service was launched to allow individuals to demonstrate their right to work in the UK. Individuals are currently able to review their right to work record online and share a code with their employer to allow them to gain access to the record.

View blog

Government proposals announced for new immigration system following Brexit

The Government has published its long awaited White Paper, outlining its proposals for a new immigration system following Brexit.

View blog

The Government’s Good Work Plan published

The Government have claimed it’s the biggest reform of employment law in 20 years but with no draft legislation or even any dates or commitments to legislate, what exactly did the government announce yesterday?

View blog

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up