0370 270 6000

CJEU shapes up nicely for Louboutin red sole trade mark

13 June 2018

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has today given its judgment in relation to a key issue in one of the most hotly debated trade mark disputes in recent times. Should Louboutin’s iconic red soled high heels be afforded trade mark protection?

Luxury shoe designer Christian Louboutin sued Van Haren for infringement of its registered trade mark for the colour red (Pantone 18-1663TP) applied to the sole of a high heeled shoe. One of the challenges to the validity of the trade mark had to do with whether the mark consisted exclusively of a shape which gives substantial value to the goods. We reported on the opinion of the Advocate General back in February, and that review provided the context to this question. The Advocate General may have given Louboutin some cause for concern.

The CJEU has now given its judgment on this issue, in favour of Louboutin. It found that the particular colour red as applied to the soles of high heeled shoes does not consist 'exclusively' of a shape (rather, it protects the colour, as applied to a specific part of a product) and so the trade mark did not fall foul of article 3(1)(e)(iii) of Directive 2008/95.

Louboutin has naturally welcomed this decision, as it takes the brand a step closer towards successful enforcement of its trade mark. The case now returns to the referring Dutch court for final judgment.

Related opinions

Right to Work Checks: Changes from 6 April 2022

From 6 April 2022, right to work checks on all migrant or settled prospective employees must be online and checks on British or Irish nationals will be manual (free) or digital (charged for).

View blog

Government’s proposals for dealing with pandemic rent arrears finally reach the statute book

The Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 was finally passed yesterday (24 March) and comes into force immediately.

View blog

Covid-19 rent arrears – the questions that remain

The Government appears set to announce plans on ‘living with Covid to restore freedom’. With the success of the retail and hospitality sector key to recovery, what protections will be on offer to tenants to deal with Covid-19 rent arrears?

View blog

Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?

In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.

View blog

Mark Daniels

Mark Daniels

Partner and Head of Business Services

View profile

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up