0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

CJEU shapes up nicely for Louboutin red sole trade mark

13 June 2018

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has today given its judgment in relation to a key issue in one of the most hotly debated trade mark disputes in recent times. Should Louboutin’s iconic red soled high heels be afforded trade mark protection?

Luxury shoe designer Christian Louboutin sued Van Haren for infringement of its registered trade mark for the colour red (Pantone 18-1663TP) applied to the sole of a high heeled shoe. One of the challenges to the validity of the trade mark had to do with whether the mark consisted exclusively of a shape which gives substantial value to the goods. We reported on the opinion of the Advocate General back in February, and that review provided the context to this question. The Advocate General may have given Louboutin some cause for concern.

The CJEU has now given its judgment on this issue, in favour of Louboutin. It found that the particular colour red as applied to the soles of high heeled shoes does not consist 'exclusively' of a shape (rather, it protects the colour, as applied to a specific part of a product) and so the trade mark did not fall foul of article 3(1)(e)(iii) of Directive 2008/95.

Louboutin has naturally welcomed this decision, as it takes the brand a step closer towards successful enforcement of its trade mark. The case now returns to the referring Dutch court for final judgment.

Related opinions

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Flexible working, childcare and indirect sex discrimination – important reminder

The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’).

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Mark Daniels

Mark Daniels

Partner and Head of Business Services

View profile

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up