0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Nottingham City Council introduces new 'selective licensing' scheme for landlords

9 March 2018

The Nottingham City Council became the latest authority to introduce new licensing requirements for all private residential landlords. As of 1 August 2018, all landlords must formally apply for a 5-year licence to allow them to let their properties to tenants. The purpose of this legislation is to “raise the standards in the privately rented sector (PRS) of housing, and to ensure that all tenants living in them are able to enjoy a safe, comfortable and well managed home.”

Amongst the requirements for being issued a licence is the need to show that the proposed licensee is a ‘fit and proper person’, and one who is competent to manage the property. Compulsory training will also be a requirement for licence holders. The Council has the authority to refuse to issue a licence to those who they consider do not meet these requirements, and operating without a licence can result in prosecution and fines of up to £30,000 for each individual. The Council has confirmed, however, that registered social landlords (such as housing associations) will be exempt from these requirements. In terms of fees, the proposed cost for a licence is £780 for each individual property, however this is reduced to £520 per property for landlords who are accredited via the DASH scheme or Unipol.

These changes are a further result of the increased regulation and reforms being introduced across the property industry. The successful implementation of this scheme in Nottingham is likely to result in similar schemes being adopted across other local authorities nation-wide. To prepare against this future change, property professionals should take steps to update all landlord clients about the future possibility of their need to obtain selective licences, and to ensure that they are kept fully aware of their existing legal duties and obligations, as a failure to adhere to existing legislation could result in any future licence applications being dismissed. 

related opinions

Marriott International: a look behind the ICO’s £99m fine and what this means for corporate acquisitions

Last month, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) announced notice of its intention to fine (NOI) Marriott International, Inc. £99m for infringements of the GDPR.

View blog

SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement

On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

Watch this space on breach of contract, vicarious liability and assumption of responsibility

The concept of Assumption of Responsibility is on many stakeholders’ minds at the moment following the Supreme Court decision in CN & GN v Poole.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up