0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

judge upholds unfair prejudice claim against Blackpool Football Club following gentleman's agreement

15 November 2017

In the case of VB Football Assets v (1) Blackpool Football Club (Properties) Ltd (2) Owen Oyston (3) Karl Oyston (4) Blackpool Football Club Ltd [2017] EWHC 2767 (Ch) the Court held that a ‘gentleman’s agreement’ existed between VB and Owen Oyston where VB would acquire a parity shareholding with the first respondent in the Club and have a joint say in the management following a subscription agreement and two loan agreements.

As a result, the High Court concluded that VB was entitled to petition as a minority shareholder in Blackpool F.C. under s.994 of the Companies Act 2006 for an order that the company’s affairs had been conducted in a manner that was unfairly prejudicial to the interests of members.

The Judge considered that the respondents completely failed to separate out transactions that were in the best interests of Blackpool F.C. from those in the interests of the wider Oyston Group. The petition was then granted by the Court on the basis that improper payments had been made to the majority shareholders which could have been paid out as dividends. In addition, VB was entitled to be treated as an equal partner in the governance of the club by virtue of the ‘gentleman’s agreement’. The appropriate relief granted was for the respondents to be ordered to buyout VB’s entire interest in the club for £31.27 million.

This case is a prime example of where oral contracts (this one being concluded in a pub) have been upheld and have resulted in huge consequences for all parties. The case also highlights the importance of corporate responsibility and how unfair prejudice actions can be extremely costly to shareholders where there is evidence of, amongst others, breaches of fiduciary duty and/or mismanagement.

related opinions

Law Society publishes new Q&A on electronic signatures and virtual executions

Navigating the completion of corporate transactions remotely and integrating the use of electronic signatures into this process has become increasingly common since March last year. Law Society Company Law Committee, which included our Knowledge Director Emma Grant, has published a useful Q&A.

View blog

Remote trials – here to stay?

With cross-country travel and in person gatherings largely prohibited due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the Courts are using remote or virtual trials to ensure the justice system ticks along.

View blog

Directors who fail to prepare, should prepare to fail

Two recent judgments demonstrate the risk that directors (of insolvent companies) face of being personally liable if appropriate records and procedures are not followed and if it cannot be shown that certain payments were in the interests of the company.

View blog

Remote mediation – here to stay?

Mediation has long been considered an effective method of alternative dispute resolution. With ‘in-person’ mediations no longer possible, remote or online mediations have risen to the fore.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up