0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Max Schrems and 25,000 others poke at Facebook’s privacy policy in latest ECJ proceedings

24 July 2017

Following his ‘Safe Harbor’ victory, Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems is again acting as a thorn in Facebook’s side as he attempts to challenge a variety of its data protection practices, ranging from its tracking of users’ activity on external sites, absence of consent mechanisms, and aspects of its privacy policy. What distinguishes this case is the fact that Schrems is attempting to claim on behalf of 25,000 other consumers across the globe.

After appeals through the Austrian courts, the Austrian Supreme Court has recently referred the case to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to decide whether Schrems can be considered a consumer and whether he can claim on behalf of 25,000 others, some of whom are not resident in Austria or even the EU.

An opinion is due from Advocate General, Michal Bobek on 7 November 2017, with the ECJ decision expected later in the year.

This is the latest in a string of European claims against US tech firms and their handling of personal data and could have huge ramifications for companies that are slacking when it comes to personal data policies. The time and cost involved in litigating over data issues frequently deters the individual claimant from pursuing an action, but being able to join together in action, on a global scale, will see consumers considerably empowered.

This will be compounded by the introduction of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on 25 May 2018, which imposes stricter obligations on companies in and, sometimes even outside, of the EU.

It is therefore critical that companies, technological and otherwise, have a GDPR implementation plan to ensure they are compliant in time for next May.

In the meantime, watch this space for the Advocate General’s opinion in early November.

related opinions

Sexual Harassment in the workplace – consequences of getting it wrong

A partner at a Magic Circle law firm has this week been ordered to pay £235,000 in fines and costs by a disciplinary tribunal, having been found guilty of breaching his professional obligations.

View blog

Compulsory drone registration goes live on 1 October 2019

As part of the continued tightening of the restrictions on drone use within UK airspace, the latest amendments to the Air Navigation Order 2016 come into force on 30 November 2019.

View blog

Second prosecution of its kind following Ofsted investigation for running an illegal school

A Head Teacher and her father were convicted at Westminster Magistrates’ Court for running an unregistered private school in Streatham.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up