0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

procurement challenges - what constitutes confidential information?

3 April 2017

Guidance has been given in the case of Bombardier Transportation Limited v Merseytravel [2017] EWHC 575 (TCC) as to when information relating to a procurement challenge ought to be regarded as confidential and cannot be shared with third parties. In this case a third party had read of the matters which were before the court in the press and had made a request to the court of the documentation on the court file. Mr Justice Coulson discovered that all court files relating to public procurement proceedings were routinely marked 'private' with access being denied.

Mr Justice Coulson stated that “the starting point is the principle of open justice.  Unless there is a good reason why not, all civil claims in the United Kingdom should be heard in open court.” He then went on to consider the draft ‘Guidance Note on Procedures for Public Procurement Cases’ which has been drafted by the public procurement bar and judges who sit in the TCC and considered that cases ought to be dealt with in accordance with the draft note. He stated:

  1.  Confidentiality is not a bar to disclosure.
  2. Papers deemed to be confidential should be sent through the judge’s clerk to limit the risk of inadvertent disclosure or coloured paper used to identify confidential information.
  3. It is always open to the parties to make an application to the court restricting access to files.

In advance of litigation, parties should consider what protection is required for the documentation which will be disclosed and take pro-active steps to make sure that confidential information is kept confidential. 

related opinions

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Marriott International: a look behind the ICO’s £99m fine and what this means for corporate acquisitions

Last month, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) announced notice of its intention to fine (NOI) Marriott International, Inc. £99m for infringements of the GDPR.

View blog

SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement

On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up