0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

EUIPO v Szajner - when an EU TM opponents unregistered right is changed by the national courts

5 December 2016

Advocate General Kolkott’s opinion on 2 December 2016 (EUIPO v Szajner - C-598/14 P) highlights the importance of keeping up with national case law when dealing with EU trade mark opposition or invalidity appeal proceedings.

In her opinion where an earlier non-registered right protected by national law is relied upon to challenge an EU registered trade mark (or application), changes in the national court’s interpretation of the law protecting that earlier right which occur after a decision of the Board of Appeal, must be taken into account by the EU General Court on appeal.

In the UK, passing off may protect unregistered signs. In other EU Member States unfair competition is often relied upon. In this case the challenge was based upon the protection given to business names by the French Intellectual Property code. The General Court ruled, in favour of the EU trade mark owner, that the business name had a narrower field of protection than the Board of Appeal had. This was due to an interpretation of the French rules by the Cour de Cassation delivered after the Board of Appeal’s decision. In the Advocate General’s opinion the General Court was justified in doing so.

Related opinions

Importance of considering flexible working applications

An employment tribunal has awarded an employee almost £185,000 for indirect discrimination following a failure to adequately consider the employee’s flexible working request.

View blog

Flexible working, childcare and indirect sex discrimination – important reminder

The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’).

View blog

Moratoriums

The new Part A1 moratorium was introduced partly in response to the Covid-19 pandemic and its impact on businesses. The moratorium is not intended to be used to simply delay the inevitable insolvency of a company, but rather to allow breathing space for that company to restructure and/or achieve an effective rescue.

View blog

Equal pay at ASDA stores - appeal to the Supreme Court unsuccessful

35,000 workers working in ASDA’s retail business sought to compare themselves to workers at distribution depots for equal pay purposes. Find out more about this Employment Appeal Tribunal.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up