0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Advocate General highlights the importance of keeping up with national case law when dealing with EU trade mark proceedings

8 December 2016

Advocate General Kolkott’s opinion on 2 December 2016, EUIPO v Szajner - C-598/14 P, highlights the importance of keeping up with national case law when dealing with EU trade mark opposition or invalidity appeal proceedings. 

In her opinion where an earlier non-registered right protected by national law is relied upon to challenge an EU registered trade mark (or application), changes in the national court’s interpretation of the law protecting that earlier right which occur after a decision of the Board of Appeal, must be taken into account by the EU General Court on appeal. 

In the UK, passing off may protect unregistered signs. In other EU Member States unfair competition is often relied upon. 

In this case the challenge was based upon the protection given to business names by the French Intellectual Property code. The General Court ruled, in favour of the EU trade mark owner, that the business name had a narrower field of protection than the Board of Appeal had. This was due to an interpretation of the French rules by the Cour de Cassation delivered after the Board of Appeal’s decision. In the Advocate General’s opinion the General Court was justified in doing so.

Related opinions

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Flexible working, childcare and indirect sex discrimination – important reminder

The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’).

View blog

Relief for landlords as the Court of Appeal confirms that leases have been validly contracted out

One of the requirements for tenants to contract out of the security of tenure regime contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is that they make a simple or statutory declaration before entering into the lease.

View blog

Summary judgment stayed where part 26A restructuring plan pending

Landlords should reconsider summary judgment if a Part 26A restructuring plan is pending.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up