0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

High Court analyses “AgrEvo” obviousness in Merck v Shionogi

29 November 2016

Traditional challenges to the inventive step of a patent are based on an allegation that it would be obvious to take a step from a specific item of prior art to the claimed invention.

However, occasionally they may be framed on an allegation that the patent was not inventive because it made no technical contribution to the art - so called “AgrEvo obviousness” (based on the EPO Technical Board of Appeal decision).

The case of Merck v Shionogi examined the recent Court of Appeal authorities on AgrEvo obviousness and applied this to a dispute relating to Shionogi’s patent EP (UK) 1 422 218, concerning an antiviral agent for the treatment of HIV.

The court found the patent to lack inventive step and to be insufficient. If it had been valid, Merck would have infringed it.

This case also provides helpful guidance for patentees on the question of instructing multiple testifying experts in patent cases, particularly where there is an overlap in expertise of those experts. Practitioners will decide on the division of labour between such experts, and may ask an expert not to deal particular area of their expertise in evidence, to avoid duplication (and potentially inconsistency). It is clear from this decision that the court is very wary of allowing cross examination of that expert on such omissions.

related opinions

Sky’s overly broad trade marks narrowed as found partially invalid for bad faith

Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.

View blog

Equal pay and the material factor defence

Equal pay claims, once the arena for public sector organisations only, have been spreading into the private sector over the last few years.

View blog

Supreme Court awards compensation to a Professor for an invention created during his employment

A recent decision by the Supreme Court in Shanks v Unilever PLC has supported the right for employees to receive compensation for patented inventions if the invention is of ‘outstanding benefit’.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Mark Daniels

Mark Daniels

Partner and Head of Business Services

View profile

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up