0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

an Uber important decision on employment status

31 October 2016

Uber drivers are 'workers' and not self-employed, according to the Employment Tribunals in a test case brought by two claimants. Uber’s arguments that the individuals were self-employed because they were never under any obligation to switch on the App or, even if logged on, to accept any driving assignment that may be offered to them, did not assist. The Tribunal found that any driver who had the App switched on and who was in the territory in which they were authorised to work was at that time a 'worker' engaged by Uber.

The implications of this decision for Uber are that their drivers are entitled to worker rights including paid annual leave, national minimum / living wage and rest breaks. Coincidentally an inquiry by a Commons Select Committee into the issues affecting workers, zero hour contracts and the self-employed was launched last week. Uber have confirmed they wish to appeal the decision, but it reminds businesses of the complexity of determining whether individuals engaged by them are self-employed and the risks attached of getting it wrong.

related opinions

Bailleurs et locataires, vos baux commerciaux sont-ils armés pour résister à l' épreuve du futur?

Durant les deux dernières semaines, nous avons connu vu une nouvelle vague d’annonces concernant de grandes enseignes du commerce britannique.

View blog

Sexual Harassment in the workplace – consequences of getting it wrong

A partner at a Magic Circle law firm has this week been ordered to pay £235,000 in fines and costs by a disciplinary tribunal, having been found guilty of breaching his professional obligations.

View blog

High Court finds against WASPI women

The High Court has rejected the judicial review claim brought by the campaign group BackTo60 against the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).

View blog

When does misconduct by a professional amount to professional misconduct?

The Court of Appeal has considered what amounts to professional conduct for the purposes of the MHPS in the case of Idu –v- The East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust.
The allegations raised against the Appellant surgeon included, amongst others, refusals to follow management instructions and inappropriate (rude, uncivil, and, on occasions, aggressive) verbal and written communications.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up