0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Cayman Court of Appeal - clarity on rankings for unpaid redemption creditors

11 August 2016

In the case of Primeo Fund (in official liquidation) v Herald Fund SPC (in official liquidation), the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal considered an appeal by Herald from the Grand Court’s first instance decision that investors who have redeemed their shares but remain unpaid at the start of a company’s liquidation are entitled to prove in the liquidation as a creditor for their redemption proceeds.

The Court of Appeal held that as a matter of common law, an investor transitions from a member to a creditor of a company when it redeems its shares pursuant to the company’s articles of association. As Primeo had redeemed its shares before Herald’s liquidation, the Court of Appeal had to decide whether Primeo’s redemption claim was enforceable under s37(7)(a) of the Companies Law (2013 revision) or otherwise.

If the claim fell within s37(7)(a), then it would have been subject to the prohibition on the enforcement of a redemption claim in a liquidation unless the company could have lawfully made a distribution of that amount to the investor between the date of redemption and the commencement of the winding up. It would also impact upon the order of priority of creditors.

The Court of Appeal held that s37(7)(a) does not apply to an investor whose shares were redeemed in accordance with the company’s articles of association before the commencement of its liquidation and upheld the first instance decision, with redemption creditors ranking behind the company's general creditors but ahead of its shareholders.

This case provides some useful clarity on the status and rankings of claims for unpaid share redemption proceeds in the liquidation of Cayman Islands funds.

related opinions

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Marriott International: a look behind the ICO’s £99m fine and what this means for corporate acquisitions

Last month, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) announced notice of its intention to fine (NOI) Marriott International, Inc. £99m for infringements of the GDPR.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

Discount rate remains negative

The much anticipated revision of the discount rate has arrived with the Lord Chancellor, David Gauke, announcing that it will be fixed at -0.25%.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up