0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Cayman Court of Appeal - clarity on rankings for unpaid redemption creditors

11 August 2016

In the case of Primeo Fund (in official liquidation) v Herald Fund SPC (in official liquidation), the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal considered an appeal by Herald from the Grand Court’s first instance decision that investors who have redeemed their shares but remain unpaid at the start of a company’s liquidation are entitled to prove in the liquidation as a creditor for their redemption proceeds.

The Court of Appeal held that as a matter of common law, an investor transitions from a member to a creditor of a company when it redeems its shares pursuant to the company’s articles of association. As Primeo had redeemed its shares before Herald’s liquidation, the Court of Appeal had to decide whether Primeo’s redemption claim was enforceable under s37(7)(a) of the Companies Law (2013 revision) or otherwise.

If the claim fell within s37(7)(a), then it would have been subject to the prohibition on the enforcement of a redemption claim in a liquidation unless the company could have lawfully made a distribution of that amount to the investor between the date of redemption and the commencement of the winding up. It would also impact upon the order of priority of creditors.

The Court of Appeal held that s37(7)(a) does not apply to an investor whose shares were redeemed in accordance with the company’s articles of association before the commencement of its liquidation and upheld the first instance decision, with redemption creditors ranking behind the company's general creditors but ahead of its shareholders.

This case provides some useful clarity on the status and rankings of claims for unpaid share redemption proceeds in the liquidation of Cayman Islands funds.

related opinions

A year on: the Capped Costs Pilot Scheme

On 14 January 2019 a Capped Costs Pilot Scheme was introduced in the Leeds and Manchester Business and Property Courts, and has been set to run for two years.

View blog

Supreme Court provides comfort to public authorities facing village green applications

In a lengthy majority judgment accompanied by two powerful dissenting opinions, the Supreme Court found yesterday that land acquired and held for statutory purposes cannot be registered as a village green where that registration is incompatible with the statutory purpose for which it is held.

View blog

Supreme Court extends whistle-blower protection

The decision of the Supreme Court extends the scope of whistle-blower protection and is a wider approach than that taken in direct discrimination claims.

View blog

Capability – the cost of getting it wrong

An 89 year old former patient pathway co-ordinator has been awarded £200,000 by an Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal and age and disability discrimination following her dismissal on capability grounds.

View blog

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up