already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

a lease break fails because a tenant did not remove extensive partitioning

29 July 2016
Riverside Park Ltd v NHS Property Services Limited is a must-read case. It provides guidance on a variety of issues associated with conditional breaks, including whether certain items are chattels or fixtures, what giving vacant possession means, interpretation of break conditions and reinstatement trigger notices. 

The court found that vacant possession had not been given because extensive partitioning had not been removed. The partitioning was found to be chattel as opposed to a fixture and the court neatly summarises and applies the relevant law. Interestingly however the court found that the tenant was on “stronger ground” in arguing that its failure to remove kitchen units, floor coverings, window blinds, an alarm and water pipes was not breach of the obligation to give vacant possession. The tenant’s failure to remove the partitioning meant vacant possession was not given and the 2013 break option failed.        

The message:  If you are thinking about exercising a break it is crucial you take advice and that you take a cautious view on whether items need to be removed as part of any conditions of the break. 

related opinions

Across the board increase in injury to feelings awards

The 'Vento bands' have long prescribed the level of award to be made for injury to feelings in harassment and discrimination claims. The Court of Appeal has recently confirmed that the uplift does apply in the decision of De Souza v Vinci Construction (UK) Ltd.

View blog

Loser pays the winner's costs? Not when a statutory demand is served prematurely

The High Court exercised its discretion relating to an application to set aside a statutory demand and made a cost order against the respondent solicitors.

View blog

Employment tribunal fees - dealing with the uncertainty

Whilst celebrated by claimants and their representatives, the Supreme Court’s Decision to quash employment tribunal fees has left much uncertainty.

View blog

Max Schrems and 25,000 others poke at Facebook’s privacy policy in latest ECJ proceedings

Following his ‘Safe Harbor’ victory, Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems is again acting as a thorn in Facebook’s side as he attempts to challenge a variety of its data protection practices.

View blog