0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Devolution revolution - is central government ready?

25 April 2016

One of the key themes explored in Browne Jacobson’s report ‘Our changing state: the realities of austerity and devolution’ is the preparedness of central government for the significant changes already happening in the delivery of public sector functions in England and Wales.

We explore the extent of 'buy in' from central government, what plans have been made for things going wrong, lack of clarity around where responsibility lies as between local and central government, and the nature of the relationship between central and local government.

We make a number of recommendations for steps which central government needs to take to ensure it has the right people on board to deliver the strategy. Our thoughts chime with those of the National Audit Office who have just published a report on the English devolution deals. They say that notwithstanding increases in capacity in both the Cities and Local Growth Unit and at Treasury, there is concern that Government does not have the capacity to deal with the number of deals coming forwards either in terms of negotiation or delivery. The NAO also rightly identify the mixed economy which is likely to result from the current programme.

In our view, this mixed economy may well have a significant impact on central government teams who will need to combine their traditional delivery and oversight role, with an unfamiliar commissioning role. Whether in fact such a ‘two tier’ system will be able to actually function is a serious question. We recognise that senior people in Government are currently driving the devolution revolution, but have concerns that when their focus shifts, and it inevitably will, that operational staff within Government will be left struggling to cope with a vastly altered landscape and insufficient skills and experience to cope with the new normal.

Related opinions

Flexible working, childcare and indirect sex discrimination – important reminder

The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’).

View blog

School not liable for reckless actions of a student

The decision reinforces that the standard of the duty of care owed by schools is one or reasonableness.

View blog

Moratoriums

The new Part A1 moratorium was introduced partly in response to the Covid-19 pandemic and its impact on businesses. The moratorium is not intended to be used to simply delay the inevitable insolvency of a company, but rather to allow breathing space for that company to restructure and/or achieve an effective rescue.

View blog

Covid-19 insolvency measures extension

From 26 March 2021 the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (Coronavirus) (Extension of the Relevant Period) Regulations 2021 will come into force with the effect of extending several of the temporary measures brought in by the Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 (CIGA).

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up