0370 270 6000

Can the courts order governments to cut carbon emissions?

25 June 2015

According to a landmark ruling issued on 24 June 2015 in the Netherlands, the Dutch Government is failing to protect its citizens from hazardous climate change and has been ordered to reduce CO2 emissions by 25% by 2020.

Environmental group Urgenda Foundation’s case is apparently the first in the world to use human rights to argue for protection against climate change. Similar claims are already being considered in other countries, including the UK and US.

Could the UK face a similar challenge? Although the UK Government has committed to 80% reduction by 2050, the Dutch court held that short-term mitigation is vital. The national, EU and international legal framework relied on by Urgenda could apply against any national government, while the underlying principle – that a state is legally obliged to protect its citizens from hazardous climate change – is potentially ground-breaking. What remains to be seen is whether the Dutch Government will appeal or comply with the order and whether this will affect UK Government policy.

Related opinions

Challenges from potential Foster Carers and Adopters

Our immediate future shows a renewed focus on foster care. We’re going to see a new nationwide-drive to recruit foster carers and the implementation of a more robust, and potentially financially-generous system for encouraging friends and family to care for their relatives (both when extended families cannot cope or provide care for any reason).

View blog

Unions bowled over by strike legislation

As of 21 July, two separate pieces of legislation came into force which seeks to mitigate against strike action. It should come as no surprise that this is a direct response to the rail strikes, which have dominated the news in the last couple of months.

View blog

No change to status tests

The Government has referred to the greater “clarity” provided by the Supreme Court’s decision in Uber BV and others v Aslam and others, considering it appropriate to allow the impact of this decision to take effect, before considering further intervention.

View blog

A helpful decision for claimant solicitors on Limitation under the Human Rights Act in abuse and assault cases?

In this month’s decision of CJ & Ors v Chief Constable of Wiltshire Police the court was given the task of considering whether a sexual abuse action, brought under the Human Rights Act 1998 should be allowed to proceed to trial where the claim had been brought outside the one-year period prescribed by the Act.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up