0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Patent litigation - approach summary judgment / strike out with caution

15 May 2015

Swift resolution of patent disputes is key to minimising significant unnecessary costs and uncertainty. However, it is rare that patent infringement proceedings are suitable for summary judgment or strike out.

So it was proved in a recent case before the English High Court. Unwired Planet sued a number of telecommunications equipment providers, including Huawei and Samsung, for patent infringement based partly on some of its claimed standard essential patents. Typically, there had been various licence negotiations between the parties. These negotiations formed part of the dispute, to the extent that the parties were unable to agree whether the licence terms offered by Unwired Planet are FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) as required by the standard setting body (ETSI).

Huawei sought summary judgment (alternatively strike out) on the question of whether Unwired Planet’s licence proposals were FRAND. Refusing to deal with this issue on a summary basis, or to strike out Unwired Planet’s application for a declaration that its offers were FRAND, the court found that this was a matter suitable for trial – it required an understanding of the complex factual matrix and also a consideration of the parallel role played by competition law.

The trial of this ‘non-technical’ part of the claim is not due to take place until October 2016. This, only after five technical trials (one for each patent) have taken place, commencing in October 2015.

Though it is a welcomed step that these proceedings have been docketed to a single judge, one wonders whether a prioritisation of the non-technical trial might have assisted the parties in settling the dispute at the earliest possible stage.

Related opinions

Flexible working, childcare and indirect sex discrimination – important reminder

The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’).

View blog

Directors who fail to prepare, should prepare to fail

Two recent judgments demonstrate the risk that directors (of insolvent companies) face of being personally liable if appropriate records and procedures are not followed and if it cannot be shown that certain payments were in the interests of the company.

View blog

AI: support for buying new technology

The world of healthtech and digitech is continuing to develop at pace and as a result of Covid-19 we are seeing it being used and implemented to a greater extent across the NHS and wider health and care market.

View blog

Impact of Covid-19 upon level of fine

Two cases have considered the issue of Covid 19 as part of the sentencing exercise. In the most recent, failures by a principal contractor Modus Workspace, who design and refit refurbishments, led to a £1.1 million fine after an engineer was injured from a fall from a roof.

View blog

Mark Daniels

Mark Daniels

Partner and Head of Business Services

View profile

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up