0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

patent litigation - approach summary judgment / strike out with caution

15 May 2015

Swift resolution of patent disputes is key to minimising significant unnecessary costs and uncertainty. However, it is rare that patent infringement proceedings are suitable for summary judgment or strike out.

So it was proved in a recent case before the English High Court. Unwired Planet sued a number of telecommunications equipment providers, including Huawei and Samsung, for patent infringement based partly on some of its claimed standard essential patents. Typically, there had been various licence negotiations between the parties. These negotiations formed part of the dispute, to the extent that the parties were unable to agree whether the licence terms offered by Unwired Planet are FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) as required by the standard setting body (ETSI).

Huawei sought summary judgment (alternatively strike out) on the question of whether Unwired Planet’s licence proposals were FRAND. Refusing to deal with this issue on a summary basis, or to strike out Unwired Planet’s application for a declaration that its offers were FRAND, the court found that this was a matter suitable for trial – it required an understanding of the complex factual matrix and also a consideration of the parallel role played by competition law.

The trial of this ‘non-technical’ part of the claim is not due to take place until October 2016. This, only after five technical trials (one for each patent) have taken place, commencing in October 2015.

Though it is a welcomed step that these proceedings have been docketed to a single judge, one wonders whether a prioritisation of the non-technical trial might have assisted the parties in settling the dispute at the earliest possible stage.

related opinions

Sky’s overly broad trade marks narrowed as found partially invalid for bad faith

Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.

View blog

Beards: Smart or Not?

In Sethi v Elements Personnel Services Limited, the Employment Tribunal has considered the implications of dress codes on men.

View blog

Supreme Court provides comfort to public authorities facing village green applications

In a lengthy majority judgment accompanied by two powerful dissenting opinions, the Supreme Court found yesterday that land acquired and held for statutory purposes cannot be registered as a village green where that registration is incompatible with the statutory purpose for which it is held.

View blog

Multi Skilled Visit: what is the impact of it being a right under the new Electronic Communications Code?

A Multi Skilled Visit (MSV) is when a survey is carried out on behalf of operators for the purpose of seeing whether a new site is suitable for the installation and operation of electronic communications equipment.

View blog

Mark Daniels

Mark Daniels

Partner and Head of Business Services

View profile

mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up