0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

employers in dark as tribunal rules holiday pay must account for commission

1 April 2015

An employment tribunal ruling in the recent case of ‘Lock’ has held that employers must take commission payments into account when calculating four weeks’ holiday pay entitlement under Regulation 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR). Commission payments need not be considered for the additional 1.6 weeks provided for by Regulation 13A, which can remain remunerated at ‘basic’ pay.

Of comfort to employers is that from 1 July 2015 a two year cap on backdated claims will take effect. Furthermore, following Bear Scotland, claims for a series of unlawful deductions presented before 1 July 2015 will only be recoverable to the extent that no more than three months have elapsed between deductions.

However, despite the clarification of the position on commission, employers have been left without definitive guidance as to how to calculate such a provision.

In particular questions remain over how employers are to quantify the sum, over what reference period ‘normal’ pay is to be considered, and how it is to be proportioned.

Whether employers opt to pay the first four weeks’ leave at ‘normal’ rate and the remaining 1.6 weeks at ‘basic’, and whether a 12 or 52-week reference period is applied to quantify ‘normal’ remains to be determined.

related opinions

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

Can an application to postpone a hearing be refused?

This case highlights the importance of Claimants obtaining their own medical evidence in such matters especially when it is pivotal to their claim.

View blog

Employer obliged to pay settlement despite employees confidentiality breach

In Duchy Farm Kennels Ltd v Steels the employer was found not to have been relieved of its obligation to pay a settlement sum, despite the former employee having breached the confidentiality clause contained in the settlement agreement.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up