0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

Forgotten your password?

Outcome on anti-avoidance of exclusivity clauses in zero hours contracts

13 March 2015

As a result of concerns that employers could avoid a ban on exclusivity clauses in ZHC (e.g. by offering 1 hour contracts), the Government has announced plans to introduce draft regulations, ensuring that:

  • exclusivity terms are unenforceable unless there is a guaranteed minimum level of income for the worker. It is proposed that the minimum income will be calculated by reference to an agreed number of hours multiplied by the National Minimum Wage.
  • if the employer subjects the worker to detriment on grounds that they performed services for another employer, the worker will be entitled to seek compensation through an Employment Tribunal and the employer could be subject to financial penalties.

It appears that it is proposed that these measures will not apply where a worker receives at least £20 per hour.

It remains to be seen to what extent these proposals will remain in force following the general election but nevertheless an important development to note.

Related opinions

Compulsory vaccinations in care homes

Care homes will need to take steps to assess the impact of these Regulations on their workforce.

View blog

Evidence of guilt not always required for fair dismissal

This case offers particularly helpful guidance for employers when being faced with employees who are suspected of criminal wrongdoing, albeit care should always be given to ensure allegations are clearly defined and considered on their own merits.

View blog

Handing back an empty shell of a building did not prevent a tenant from exercising a break clause

Break rights have proved a fertile source of litigation over the last few years. More often than not, tenants have found themselves on the wrong end of the decisions. However, a Court of Appeal decision yesterday has bucked that trend.

View blog

Flexible working, childcare and indirect sex discrimination – important reminder

The courts have long recognised that, on a societal level, women bear a greater burden of childcare responsibilities than men which can make it more difficult for women to comply with employer requirements for flexible working (known as the ‘childcare disparity’).

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up