0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

MPs back controversial reforms to judicial review

10 December 2014

The government is pressing ahead with its plans to reform the judicial review process despite opposition from the House of Lords.

The reforms would:

  •  limit the freedom of courts to decide which case should proceed to full JR hearings;
  •  force applicants to disclose information about the source of their funds; and
  •  discourage interested parties from intervening in proceedings by making it more likely that they would face costs penalties.

The House of Lords voted against the plans, introducing a number of amendments to the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill. MPs have now rejected those amendments.

Judicial review is the procedure through which the courts may review the legality of the decisions taken by public bodies. The court’s power to uphold the rule of law is a fundamental part of our unwritten constitution. The government is understandably keen to curb the increasing number of judicial review claims. However – as critics have noted the constitution should not be tampered with to suit a particular political agenda.

related opinions

Second prosecution of its kind following Ofsted investigation for running an illegal school

A Head Teacher and her father were convicted at Westminster Magistrates’ Court for running an unregistered private school in Streatham.

View blog

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Marriott International: a look behind the ICO’s £99m fine and what this means for corporate acquisitions

Last month, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) announced notice of its intention to fine (NOI) Marriott International, Inc. £99m for infringements of the GDPR.

View blog

SFO fail to secure individual criminal convictions following Deferred Prosecution Agreement

On 16 July 2019 the Serious Fraud Office released details of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement reached with Sarclad Ltd in July 2016.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up