0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

no appeal in holiday pay cases

27 November 2014

As we reported earlier this month, the EAT confirmed that holiday pay calculations should include a sum of money reflecting normal non-guaranteed overtime.

The slightly more surprising element of the judgment was that claims for back pay would be out of time if there has been a break of more than three months between successive underpayments. It had previously been thought that claims for back pay could go back as far as 1998 when the working time regulations were introduced.

Permission to appeal was granted and a number of commentators expected that UNITE would appeal the decision to limit claims to three months. However, according to WSB, employers can breathe a sigh of relief as UNITE have confirmed they will not be appealing the decision. It may not be the end of the road though as there are rumours that claimant solicitors are considering bringing claims in the civil courts where the limitation period is six years.

related opinions

COVID-19 child protection practice - four months in - lessons learned so far

In June 2020 the University of Birmingham published a research briefing exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child protection practice.

View blog

“Caution” is now the watchword when it comes to directly awarding public sectors contracts

The judicial review proceedings brought by the Good Law Project against the Department of Health and Social Care in relation to the £108m contract the Department awarded for PPE in April are about to shine a light on Regulation 32(2)(c) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.

View blog

Will there be a return of employment tribunal fees?

The Government is reportedly considering the reinstatement of tribunal fees in respect of employment claims.

View blog

Redundancy: competitive interview processes

In this case, the Respondent’s appeal was unsuccessful. In the first instance, the decision that it unfairly dismissed various claimants following the closure of the school where they worked. The Claimants were unsuccessful in applying for substantially similar positions at a new school that opened at the same site. Read more here.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up