0370 270 6000

Not all mesothelioma claims result in a payment

16 October 2014

The case of Macarthy v Marks & Spencer is a timely reminder that not all mesothelioma claims result in a payment.

The deceased worked for a shop fitting company between 1967 and 1990 and contracted mesothelioma. It was accepted that his asbestos exposure took place on the premises of M&S but that it did not exceed the relevant exposure limits at the time.

A distinction was made between the knowledge of the specialist contractors working on behalf of M&S and the knowledge of the retailer. Whilst it is reasonable to assume that specialist contractors were aware of the Asbestos Research Council guidance in 1967 as their operatives were using protective equipment and clothing, the same could not fix the retailer with the same knowledge.

This judgment is another reminder that all is not lost when faced with a claim based on asbestos exposure. A careful analysis of the evidence is required to assess whether the level of asbestos exposure gives rise to a foreseeable risk of injury having regard to the state of knowledge at the time of exposure.

Related opinions

Revoking and reforming EU law

The Government has published the Retained EU Revocation and Reform Bill which, if passed, provides for the revocation of all “EU-derived subordinate legislation” (i.e. UK statutory instruments which were introduced to implement EU law) and retained direct EU legislation on 31 December 2023, unless legislation is specifically introduced to save them.

View blog

Gender Equality

Randstad has published a report on gender equality in the workplace based upon survey responses from 6,000 workers within the construction, education, healthcare and technology sectors. Whilst legislation relating to sex discrimination has been around for over 45 years, nearly three quarters of female workers surveyed reported that they had either experienced or witnessed inappropriate behaviour or comments from male colleagues.

View blog

Unfavourable treatment

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s recent decision in the case of Mr Michael Cowie & Others v Scottish Fire and Rescue Service provides a useful insight into favourable - or unfavourable - treatment in the context of discrimination claims.

View blog

Cameras in convenience stores: a potential hornet’s nest..?

A convenience retailer has opted to install cameras (the “Facewatch” system) at a limited number of its English stores to reduce crime and protect its staff.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up