0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

when can you offset costs against damages?

7 October 2014

In the case of Mploy Group Ltd v Denso Manufacturing UK Ltd (2014) Eder J allowed a stay of execution where the judgment creditor (M) was unable to confirm whether the terms of it’s after the event insurance policy would cover the costs it had been ordered to pay to D. The terms of the policy would not allow M to reveal whether the costs would in fact be paid. M had been awarded judgment in the case but ordered to pay D’s costs. Unfortunately, M had entered into a Company Voluntary Arrangement and D was clearly concerned that the costs would not be paid and applied for a stay of execution under CPR r.40.8A.

The stay was granted despite M arguing that there were no special circumstances as they had continued to trade, and were entitled to the damages awarded to them under the judgment and the ATE policy covered costs.

Eder J held that the main consideration when granting the stay was that the costs payable by M far outweighed the judgment debt payable by D.

Defendants should be wary when about to hand over damages and should think tactically about costs and whether a similar course of action may be appropriate.

related opinions

IR35 changes - six months and counting...

In his 2018 Autumn Budget, the then Chancellor, Phillip Hammond, announced a significant change to the way liability for IR35 breaches will be dealt with for private sector companies from April 2020.

View blog

Court of Appeal confirms all employment tribunal judgments must be published on the register, except in national security cases

Under the ET Rules, all judgments and accompanying written reasons must be published on a pubic register which the general public can access online.

View blog

Marriott International: a look behind the ICO’s £99m fine and what this means for corporate acquisitions

Last month, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) announced notice of its intention to fine (NOI) Marriott International, Inc. £99m for infringements of the GDPR.

View blog

Supreme Court backs employers seeking to enforce restrictive covenants: Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd

The Supreme Court in Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd has determined that where post-termination restrictive covenants (i.e. “non-compete” clauses) in employment contracts go further than reasonably necessary to protect an employer’s business interests, it can apply the ‘blue pencil test,’ severing the offending words and leaving the remaining enforceable clause in place.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up