0370 270 6000

CJEU considers parody exception in Deckmyn case

8 September 2014

Art. 5(3)(k) of the Infosoc Directive (regarding protection of copyright) provides that member states may provide an exception to the exclusive rights of reproduction and communication granted to an author, in cases of “use for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche“. The exception was implemented under Belgian law.

However, because the Infosoc Directive requires a ‘fair balance of rights and interests between … rightsholders and users of protected subject-matter’ the CJEU in Deckmyn suggested that the exception may not apply where a new work conveys an undesirable message with which the original author does not wish to be associated. In this case the authors of the original work argued that the new work (which the CJEU described as depicting people “wearing veils and people of colour” collecting coins thrown on the street) conveyed a discriminatory message.

This judgment is problematic not only because parody is by its very nature often controversial, but also since our perception of what is and isn’t undesirable or socially acceptable is prone to frequent change.

Related opinions

80% hours for 100% pay? That’ll do nicely

As has been widely reported this week, some 3,000 UK workers are taking part in a six month trial to assess the viability of a four-day working week without any reduction in their normal pay.

View blog

Are whistleblowers entitled to keep their employer’s confidential documents?

In Nissan v Passi, the High Court recently considered the issue of an employee retaining confidential documents belonging to his former employer in the context of the employer’s application for an injunction seeking the return of such documents from the employee.

View blog

Important opportunity to comment on case law precedent

The UK government is considering extending this power to depart from retained EU case law to additional lower courts and tribunals, namely the Court of Appeal in England and Wales and the High Court of Justice in England and Wales and their equivalents.

View blog

Sky’s overly broad trade marks narrowed as found partially invalid for bad faith

Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.

View blog

Mailing list sign up

Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up