0370 270 6000

already registered?

Please sign in with your existing account details.

need to register?

Register to access exclusive content, sign up to receive our updates and personalise your experience on brownejacobson.com.

Privacy statement - Terms and conditions

applying for summary judgment... get your facts straight

22 September 2014

In the case of Global Draw Ltd v IGT-UK Group Ltd the Commercial Court refused an application for summary judgment on the grounds that the application required the court to decide on a number of factual matters which could not be determined without a trial.

The case arose in the context of a share purchase agreement (SPA) pursuant to which the claimant was to purchase the entire share capital of the defendant. As part of the SPA the defendant agreed to indemnify the claimant in respect of two ongoing claims the defendant was party to in Italy.

Following completion of the SPA a dispute arose between the parties as to the extent of the indemnities, the claimant believing that its entitlement to the indemnity was a matter of interpretation and to which the defendant had no defence.

The Commercial Court did not agree with the claimant’s position, finding that as this dispute required determination of wider factual issues it could not be resolved on summary judgment; demonstrating that a successful summary judgment application cannot involve factual issues which need to be resolved.

related opinions

High Court finds against WASPI women

The High Court has rejected the judicial review claim brought by the campaign group BackTo60 against the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).

View blog

The importance of three magic words: subject to contract

A recent case illustrates the importance of ensuring that all emails discussing the terms of a proposed acquisition are headed ‘subject to contract’.

View blog

Vegetarianism is not a philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010

In its Judgment earlier this month, the Tribunal considered whether vegetarianism is capable of being a philosophical belief capable of protection under the Equality Act 2010.

View blog

Time to increase the £25,000 cap on contractual claims in the Employment Tribunal?

The recent case of Ugradar v Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust has highlighted that the current cap on contractual claims that can be awarded in the Employment Tribunals is outdated and capable of producing real injustice.

View blog

mailing list sign up



Select which mailings you would like to receive from us.

Sign up